FDA drug approval summary:: Pegaspargase (Oncaspar ®) for the first-line treatment of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)

被引:239
作者
Dinndorf, Patricia Anne [1 ]
Gootenberg, Joseph [1 ]
Cohen, Martin H. [1 ]
Keegan, Patricia [1 ]
Pazdur, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Off Oncol Drug Prod, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
关键词
pegaspargase; Oncaspar (R); pediatric ALL;
D O I
10.1634/theoncologist.12-8-991
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
July 24, 2006, the U. S. Food and Drug Administration granted approval to pegaspargase (Oncaspar (R); Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bridgewater, NJ; hereafter, O) for the first-line treatment of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) as a component of a multiagent chemotherapy regimen. O was previously approved in February 1994 for the treatment of patients with ALL who were hypersensitive to native forms of Lasparaginase. The trial supporting this new indication was an open label, randomized, multicenter clinical trial that enrolled 118 children (age, 1-9 years) with previously untreated, standard risk ALL. Patients received either native Escherichia coli asparaginase (Elspar (R); Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ; hereafter, E) or O along with multiagent chemotherapy during remission induction and delayed intensification (DI) phases of treatment. O, at a dose of 2,500 IU/m(2), was administered i.m. on day 3 of the 4-week induction phase and on day 3 of each of two 8-week DI phases. E, at a dose of 6,000 IU/m(2), was administered i.m. three times weekly for nine doses during induction and for six doses during each DI phase. This study allowed direct comparison of O and E for asparagine depletion, asparaginase activity, and development of asparaginase antibodies. An unplanned comparison of event-free survival (EFS) was conducted to rule out a deleterious O efficacy effect. Following induction and DI treatment there was complete (<= 1 mu M) or moderate (1-10 mu M) depletion of serum asparagine levels in the large majority of samples tested over the 4-week period in both O-treated and E-treated subjects. Similarly, depletion of cerebrospinal fluid asparagine levels during induction was similar between O-treated and E-treated subjects. The number of days asparaginase activity exceeded >0.03 IU/ml in O-treated subjects was greater than the number of days in E-treated subjects during both the induction and DI phases of treatment. There was no correlation, however, between asparaginase activity and serum asparagine levels, making the former determination less clinically relevant. Using the protocol-prespecified threshold for a positive result of >2.5 times the control, 7 of 56 (12%) subjects tested at any time during the study demonstrated antiasparaginase antibodies and 16 of 57 (28%) E subjects tested at any time during the study had antiasparaginase antibodies. In both study arms EFS was in the range of 80% at 3 years. The most serious, sometimes fatal, O toxicities were anaphylaxis, other serious allergic reactions, thrombosis (including sagittal sinus thrombosis), pancreatitis, glucose intolerance, and coagulopathy. The most common adverse events were allergic reactions (including anaphylaxis), hyperglycemia, pancreatitis, central nervous system thrombosis, coagulopathy, hyperbilirubinemia, and elevated transaminases.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 998
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Weekly polyethylene glycol conjugated L-asparaginase compared with biweekly dosing produces superior induction remission rates in childhood relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a pediatric oncology group study [J].
Abshire, TC ;
Pollock, BH ;
Billett, AL ;
Bradley, P ;
Buchanan, GR .
BLOOD, 2000, 96 (05) :1709-1715
[2]   Dose reduction of asparaginase under pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic control during induction therapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia [J].
Ahlke, E ;
NowakGottl, U ;
SchulzeWesthoff, P ;
Werber, G ;
Borste, H ;
Wurthwein, G ;
Jurgens, H ;
Boos, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1997, 96 (04) :675-681
[3]   Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of asparaginase formulations - The past, the present and recommendations for the future [J].
Avramis, VI ;
Panosyan, EH .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2005, 44 (04) :367-393
[4]   A randomized comparison of native Escherichia coli asparaginase and polyethylene glycol conjugated asparaginase for treatment of children with newly diagnosed standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia:: a Children's Cancer Group study [J].
Avramis, VI ;
Sencer, S ;
Periclou, AP ;
Sather, H ;
Bostrom, BC ;
Cohen, LJ ;
Ettinger, AG ;
Ettinger, LJ ;
Franklin, J ;
Gaynon, PS ;
Hilden, JM ;
Lange, B ;
Majlessipour, F ;
Mathew, P ;
Needle, M ;
Neglia, J ;
Reaman, G ;
Holcenberg, JS .
BLOOD, 2002, 99 (06) :1986-1994
[5]   Monitoring of asparaginase activity and asparagine levels in children on different asparaginase preparations [J].
Boos, J ;
Werber, G ;
Ahlke, E ;
SchulzeWesthoff, P ;
NowakGottl, U ;
Wurthwein, G ;
Verspohl, EJ ;
Ritter, J ;
Jurgens, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (09) :1544-1550
[7]  
Capizzi R. J. S. H., 1993, CANC MED, P796
[8]   4-AGENT INDUCTION AND INTENSIVE ASPARAGINASE THERAPY FOR TREATMENT OF CHILDHOOD ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC-LEUKEMIA [J].
CLAVELL, LA ;
GELBER, RD ;
COHEN, HJ ;
HITCHCOCKBRYAN, S ;
CASSADY, JR ;
TARBELL, NJ ;
BLATTNER, SR ;
TANTRAVAHI, R ;
LEAVITT, P ;
SALLAN, SE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 315 (11) :657-663
[9]  
ERTEL IJ, 1979, CANCER RES, V39, P3893
[10]   OPTIMAL USE OF L-ASPARAGINASE (NSC-109229) IN ACUTE LYMPHOCYTIC-LEUKEMIA [J].
JONES, B ;
HOLLAND, JF ;
GLIDEWELL, O ;
JACQUILLAT, C ;
WEIL, M ;
POCHEDLY, C ;
SINKS, L ;
CHEVALIER, L ;
MAURER, HM ;
KOCH, K ;
FALKSON, G ;
PATTERSON, R ;
SELIGMAN, B ;
SARTORIUS, J ;
KUNG, F ;
HAURANI, F ;
STUART, M ;
BURGERT, EO ;
RUYMANN, F ;
SAWITSKY, A ;
FORMAN, E ;
PLUESS, H ;
TRUMAN, J ;
HAKAMI, N .
MEDICAL AND PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 1977, 3 (04) :387-400