Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection

被引:727
作者
Rowe, MA
Kielpinski, D
Meyer, V
Sackett, CA
Itano, WM
Monroe, C
Wineland, DJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Div Time & Frequency, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Phys, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/35057215
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Local realism is the idea that objects have definite properties whether or not they are measured, and that measurements of these properties are not affected by events taking place sufficiently far away(1). Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen(2) used these reasonable assumptions to conclude that quantum mechanics is incomplete. Starting in 1965, Bell and others constructed mathematical inequalities whereby experimental tests could distinguish between quantum mechanics and local realistic theories(1,3-5). Many experiments(1,6-15) have since been done that are consistent with quantum mechanics and inconsistent with local realism. But these conclusions remain the subject of considerable interest and debate, and experiments are still being refined to overcome 'loopholes' that might allow a local realistic interpretation. Here we have measured correlations in the classical properties of massive entangled particles (Be-9(+) ions): these correlations violate a form of Bell's inequality. Our measured value of the appropriate Bell's 'signal' is 2.25 +/- 0.03, whereas a value of 2 is the maximum allowed by local realistic theories of nature. In contrast to previous measurements with massive particles, this violation of Bell's inequality was obtained by use of a complete set of measurements. Moreover, the high detection efficiency of our apparatus eliminates the so-called 'detection' loophole.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 794
页数:4
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   EXPERIMENTAL REALIZATION OF EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN-BOHM GEDANKENEXPERIMENT - A NEW VIOLATION OF BELL INEQUALITIES [J].
ASPECT, A ;
GRANGIER, P ;
ROGER, G .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1982, 49 (02) :91-94
[2]   Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever [J].
Aspect, A .
NATURE, 1999, 398 (6724) :189-190
[3]   EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF BELL INEQUALITIES USING TIME-VARYING ANALYZERS [J].
ASPECT, A ;
DALIBARD, J ;
ROGER, G .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1982, 49 (25) :1804-1807
[4]   Bell's inequality test with entangled atoms [J].
Beige, A ;
Munro, WJ ;
Knight, PL .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2000, 62 (05) :052102-052101
[5]  
Bell J. S., 1964, Physics Physique Fizika, V1, P195, DOI [DOI 10.1103/PHYSICSPHYSIQUEFIZIKA.1.195, 10.1103/Physics-PhysiqueFizika.1.195]
[6]  
Bell J.S., 1971, P INT SCH PHYS COURS, P171
[7]   Testing Bell's inequality with two-level atoms via population spectroscopy [J].
Brif, C ;
Mann, A .
EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 2000, 49 (01) :1-7
[8]   PROPOSED EXPERIMENT TO TEST LOCAL HIDDEN-VARIABLE THEORIES [J].
CLAUSER, JF ;
HORNE, MA ;
SHIMONY, A ;
HOLT, RA .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1969, 23 (15) :880-&
[9]  
CLAUSER JF, 1978, REP PROGR PHYS, V41, P1883
[10]   YOUNG INTERFERENCE EXPERIMENT WITH LIGHT SCATTERED FROM 2 ATOMS [J].
EICHMANN, U ;
BERGQUIST, JC ;
BOLLINGER, JJ ;
GILLIGAN, JM ;
ITANO, WM ;
WINELAND, DJ ;
RAIZEN, MG .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1993, 70 (16) :2359-2362