Prospects for treatment of paraquat-induced lung fibrosis with immunosuppressive drugs and the need for better prediction of outcome: a systematic review

被引:88
作者
Eddleston, M
Wilks, MF
Buckley, NA
机构
[1] Univ Colombo, Dept Clin Med, Fac Med, Ox Col Collaborat, Colombo 08, Sri Lanka
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Fac Med, Dept Clin Pharmacol & Toxicol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Syngenta Crop Protect AG, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Clin Med, Ctr Trop Med, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1093/qjmed/hcg137
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Acute paraquat self-poisoning is a significant problem in parts of Asia, the Pacific and the Caribbean. Ingestion of large amounts of paraquat results in rapid death, but smaller doses often cause a delayed lung fibrosis that is usually fatal. Anti-neutrophil ('immunosuppressive') treatment has been recommended to prevent lung fibrosis, but there is no consensus on efficacy. Aim: To review the evidence for the use of immunosuppression in paraquat poisoning, and to identify validated prognostic systems that would allow the use of data from historical control studies and the future identification of patients who might benefit from immunosuppression. Design: Systematic review. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for 'paraquat' together with 'poisoning' or 'overdose'. We cross-checked references and contacted experts, and searched on [www.google.com] and [www.yahoo.com] using 'paraquat', 'cyclophosphamide', 'methylprednisolone' and 'prognosis'. Results: We found ten clinical studies of immunosuppression in paraquat poisoning. One was a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Seven used historical controls only; the other two were small (n = 1 and n = 4). Mortality in controls and patients varied markedly between studies. Three of the seven non-RCT controlled studies measured plasma paraquat; analysis using Proudfoot's or Hart's nomograms did not suggest that immunosuppression increased survival in these studies. Of 16 prognostic systems for paraquat poisoning, none has been independently validated in a large cohort. Discussion: The authors of the RCT have performed valuable and difficult research, but their results are hypothesis-forming rather than conclusive; elsewhere, the use of historical controls is problematic. In the absence of a validated prognostic marker, a large RCT of immunosuppression using death as the primary outcome is required. This RCT should also prospectively test and validate the available prognostic methods, so that future patients can be selected for this and other therapies on admission.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 824
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   LEUKOCYTE SUPPRESSION IN TREATMENT OF 72 PATIENTS WITH PARAQUAT POISONING [J].
ADDO, E ;
POONKING, T .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8490) :1117-1120
[2]  
ADDO E, 1984, W INDIAN MED J, V33, P220
[3]   The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF ;
Moher, D ;
Egger, M ;
Davidoff, F ;
Elbourne, D ;
Gotzsche, PC ;
Lang, T .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) :663-694
[4]   PROGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF PARAQUAT POISONING - A REVIEW OF 28 CASES [J].
BISMUTH, C ;
GARNIER, R ;
DALLY, S ;
FOURNIER, PE ;
SCHERRMANN, JM .
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY-CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1982, 19 (05) :461-474
[5]   Pulse corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide in paraquat poisoning [J].
Buckley, NA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 163 (02) :585-585
[6]   Combined methylprednisolone and dexamethasone therapy for paraquat poisoning [J].
Chen, GH ;
Lin, JL ;
Huang, YK .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (11) :2584-2587
[7]  
Chomchai S.C., 2003, J TOXICOL-CLIN TOXIC, V41, P520
[8]  
de Maglia JB, 2000, MED CLIN-BARCELONA, V115, P530
[9]   Patterns and problems of deliberate self-poisoning in the developing world [J].
Eddleston, M .
QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 93 (11) :715-731
[10]  
FENELLY JF, 1971, J IRISH MED ASSOC, V64, P69