Supplemental water releases for fisheries restoration in a Brazilian floodplain river: A conceptual model

被引:11
作者
Godinho, Alexandre L. [1 ]
Kynard, Boyd
Martinez, Carlos B.
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Fish Passage Ctr, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Grad Program Wildlife & Fisheries Conservat, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[3] SO Conte Anadromous Fish Res Ctr, US Geol Survey, Leetown Sci Ctr, Turners Falls, MA USA
关键词
hydroelectric dam effects; floods; fisheries restoration; floodplain restoration; fish spawning; ichthyoplankton drift;
D O I
10.1002/rra.1018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Highly productive floodplain rivers in Brazil and elsewhere provide livelihood and recreational fishing for millions of people around the world, but damming and controlled water discharge are a threat to these valuable ecosystems. Supplemental water releases (SWRs) at a dam are increasingly used for restoring fisheries productivity in many floodplain rivers. We proposed a conceptual model for a hypothetical water release to enhance fisheries using Tres Marias Reservoir (TMR) on the Sao Francisco River (SFR), Brazil. The information needed by the model follows: (i) Biologically, what is the best release date? (ii) How much water will be released? (iii) What is the pattern of impoundment and how much impounded water will be released? (iv) What is the lost revenue to the power plant associated with SWR? (v) What is the relationship between river discharge and the area of floodplain that is flooded? (vi) What is the relationship between SWR and fisheries value? Ichthyoplankton studies in the SFR showed a clear positive relationship between fish density and water level (WL). While the relationship between WL and floodplain area flooded and recruitment is not known, we concluded the best date for release is when there is a natural flood, which naturally triggers fish spawning and the SWR will add to the natural flood and cover a greater floodplain area. The released volume will range from 0.302km(3) to 2.192 km(3), depending on SWR duration. In most years from 1976 to 2003, TMR impounded enough water for SWR only in the second half of the fish-spawning season (January-March). Lost revenue at TMR depended on release volume and ranged from US$ 0.493 million to US$ 3.452 million for the actual power rate. However, SWR could increase commercial fisheries income an estimated US$ 4.468 million. We forecast that SWR can bring fisheries benefits that surpass the lost revenue. Published in 2007 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 962
页数:16
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Acreman M. C., 1996, WATER MANAGEMENT WET
  • [2] ALVES CBM, 1998, ANAIS SEMINARIO REGI, V8, P1523
  • [3] ALVES CBM, 2001, PEIXES RIO VELHAS
  • [4] ALVES CBM, 1995, THESIS U FEDERAL MIN
  • [5] *ANEEL, 2004, DIAR OF, V141, P128
  • [6] ANEEL (Agencia Nacional de Energia Eletrica), 2002, ATL EN EL BRAS
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2003, AGUAS PEIXES PESCADO
  • [8] BAYLEY PB, 1981, T AM FISH SOC, V110, P351, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1981)110<351:FYFTAI>2.0.CO
  • [9] 2
  • [10] BRAGA RA, 1964, B SOC CEARENSE AGRON, V5, P77