Responsiveness of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) to disease progression and therapeutic intervention in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis

被引:35
作者
Cadavid, Diego [1 ]
Tang, Yongqiang [2 ]
O'Neill, Gilmore [1 ]
机构
[1] Biogen Inc, Expt Neurol Grp, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[2] Biogen Inc, Biostat Grp, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
关键词
Disability; EDSS; Effect size; Multiple sclerosis; PPMS; SPMS; FUNCTIONAL COMPOSITE; DOUBLE-BLIND; MS; MULTICENTER; IMPAIRMENT; TRIAL; INTERFERON-BETA-1A; PERFORMANCE; OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.33588/rn.5106.2010390
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. The standard approach in relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) has been to measure therapeutic effects on clinical exacerbations and physical disability as determined by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). However, measuring clinical relapses is not a viable option in the progressive forms of MS because of their low frequency. Therefore, the standard approach in clinical trials of progressive forms of MS has been to use the EDSS as primary outcome measure. Patients and methods. We examined the responsiveness of the EDSS to disease progression and treatment effects in the context of clinical trials of secondary progressive (SPMS) and primary progressive (PPMS) MS and compared it to the three functional tasks of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC): the Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW), the 9 Hole PEG (9HP), and the Paced Auditory Serial Attention Test (PASAT). Results. The effect size of the EDSS after two years on placebo was only 0.2-0.3 in both SPMS and PPMS, similar to the 9HP and the PASAT. In contrast, the effect size of the T25FW was much greater and driven to a large extent by subjects who could not complete the task. Conclusions. The EDSS shows poor responsiveness to both disease progression and treatment effects in SPMS and PPMS. The use of alternative primary outcome measures is recommended for therapeutic trials of progressive MS.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 329
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Progression on the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite in multiple sclerosis: what is the optimal cut-off for the three components? [J].
Bosma, L. V. A. E. ;
Kragt, J. J. ;
Brieva, L. ;
Khaleeli, Z. ;
Montalban, X. ;
Polman, C. H. ;
Thompson, A. J. ;
Tintore, M. ;
Uitdehaag, B. M. J. .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2010, 16 (07) :862-867
[2]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[3]   Benefit of interferon β-1a on MSFC progression in secondary progressive MS [J].
Cohen, JA ;
Cutter, GR ;
Fischer, JS ;
Goodman, AD ;
Heidenreich, FR ;
Kooijmans, MF ;
Sandrock, AW ;
Rudick, RA ;
Simon, JH ;
Simonian, NA ;
Tsao, EC ;
Whitaker, JN .
NEUROLOGY, 2002, 59 (05) :679-687
[4]   Use of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite as an outcome measure in a phase 3 clinical trial [J].
Cohen, JA ;
Cutter, GR ;
Fischer, JS ;
Goodman, AD ;
Heidenreich, FR ;
Jak, AJ ;
Kniker, JE ;
Kooijmans, MF ;
Lull, JM ;
Sandrock, AW ;
Simon, JH ;
Simonian, NA ;
Whitaker, JN .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2001, 58 (06) :961-967
[5]   Is a 20% change in MSFC components clinically meaningful? [J].
Contelloe, Lisa ;
Hutchinson, Michael .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, 2007, 13 (08) :1076-1076
[6]   The patient knows best: significant change in the physical component of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29 physical) [J].
Costelloe, Lisa ;
O'Rourke, Killian ;
Kearney, Hugh ;
McGuigan, Christopher ;
Gribbin, Lisa ;
Duggan, Marguerite ;
Daly, Leslie ;
Tubridy, Niall ;
Hutchinson, Michael .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 78 (08) :841-844
[7]   Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure [J].
Cutter, GR ;
Baier, ML ;
Rudick, RA ;
Cookfair, DL ;
Fischer, JS ;
Petkau, J ;
Syndulko, K ;
Weinshenker, BG ;
Antel, JP ;
Confavreux, C ;
Ellison, GW ;
Lublin, F ;
Miller, AE ;
Rao, SM ;
Reingold, S ;
Thompson, A ;
Willoughby, E .
BRAIN, 1999, 122 :871-882
[8]   A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale [J].
Eton, DT ;
Cella, D ;
Yost, KJ ;
Yount, SE ;
Peterman, AH ;
Neuberg, DS ;
Sledge, GW ;
Wood, WC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (09) :898-910
[9]  
Fischer J.S., 2001, Multiple sclerosis functional composite: Administration and scoring manual
[10]   Comparing the ability of various compositive outcomes to discriminate treatment effects in MS clinical trials [J].
Goodkin, DE ;
Priore, RL ;
Wende, KE ;
Campion, M ;
Bourdette, DN ;
Herndon, RM ;
Fischer, JS ;
Jacobs, LD ;
Cookfair, DL ;
Rudick, RA ;
Richert, JR ;
Salazar, AM ;
Granger, CV ;
Simon, JH ;
Alam, JJ ;
Bartoszak, DM ;
Braiman, J ;
Brownscheidle, CM ;
Coats, ME ;
Cohan, SL ;
Dougherty, DS ;
Kinkel, RP ;
Mass, MK ;
Munschauer, FE ;
Pullicino, PM ;
Scherokman, BJ ;
Weinstock-Guttman, B ;
Whitham, RH .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, 1998, 4 (06) :480-486