Short communication: Genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population

被引:80
作者
Pryce, J. E. [1 ]
Gredler, B. [2 ]
Bolormaa, S. [1 ]
Bowman, P. J. [1 ]
Egger-Danner, C. [3 ]
Fuerst, C. [3 ]
Emmerling, R. [4 ]
Soelkner, J. [2 ]
Goddard, M. E. [1 ,5 ]
Hayes, B. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Primary Ind Victoria, Biosci Res Div, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
[2] Univ Nat Resources & Appl Life Sci Vienna, Dept Sustainable Agr Syst, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[3] ZuchtData EDV Dienstleistungen GmbH, A-1200 Vienna, Austria
[4] Bavarian State Res Ctr Agr, Inst Anim Breeding, D-85586 Poing Grub, Germany
[5] Univ Melbourne, Fac Land & Food Resources, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
genomic selection; Holstein; Jersey; Fleckvieh; DGAT1; GENE; PREDICTION; CATTLE;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2010-3719
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Three breeds (Fleckvieh, Holstein, and Jersey) were included in a reference population, separately and together, to assess the accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values in single-breed validation populations. The accuracy of genomic selection was defined as the correlation between estimated breeding values, calculated using phenotypic data, and genomic breeding values. The Holstein and Jersey populations were from Australia, whereas the Fleckvieh population (dual-purpose Simmental) was from Austria and Germany. Both a BLUP with a multi-breed genomic relationship matrix (GBLUP) and a Bayesian method (BayesA) were used to derive the prediction equations. The hypothesis tested was that having a multi-breed reference population increased the accuracy of genomic selection. Minimal advantage existed of either GBLUP or BayesA multi-breed genomic evaluations over single-breed evaluations. However, when the goal was to predict genomic breeding values for a breed with no individuals in the reference population, using 2 other breeds in the reference was generally better than only 1 breed.
引用
收藏
页码:2625 / 2630
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Reliability of Genomic Predictions Across Multiple Populations [J].
de Roos, A. P. W. ;
Hayes, B. J. ;
Goddard, M. E. .
GENETICS, 2009, 183 (04) :1545-1553
[2]  
Gilmour A.R., 2006, ASREML USER GUIDE RE
[3]   Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle:: Identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition [J].
Grisart, B ;
Coppieters, W ;
Farnir, F ;
Karim, L ;
Ford, C ;
Berzi, P ;
Cambisano, N ;
Mni, M ;
Reid, S ;
Simon, P ;
Spelman, R ;
Georges, M ;
Snell, R .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2002, 12 (02) :222-231
[4]   Technical note: Prediction of breeding values using marker-derived relationship matrices [J].
Hayes, B. J. ;
Goddard, M. E. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2008, 86 (09) :2089-2092
[5]   Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations [J].
Hayes, Ben J. ;
Bowman, Phillip J. ;
Chamberlain, Amanda C. ;
Verbyla, Klara ;
Goddard, Mike E. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2009, 41
[6]  
HILL W G, 1968, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, V38, P226, DOI 10.1007/BF01245622
[7]   Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance [J].
Ibanez-Escriche, Noelia ;
Fernando, Rohan L. ;
Toosi, Ali ;
Dekkers, Jack C. M. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2009, 41
[8]   DGAT1 polymorphism in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle breeds [J].
Kaupe, B ;
Winter, A ;
Fries, R ;
Erhardt, G .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 2004, 71 (02) :182-187
[9]   Development and Characterization of a High Density SNP Genotyping Assay for Cattle [J].
Matukumalli, Lakshmi K. ;
Lawley, Cynthia T. ;
Schnabel, Robert D. ;
Taylor, Jeremy F. ;
Allan, Mark F. ;
Heaton, Michael P. ;
O'Connell, Jeff ;
Moore, Stephen S. ;
Smith, Timothy P. L. ;
Sonstegard, Tad S. ;
Van Tassell, Curtis P. .
PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (04)
[10]   A Genealogical Interpretation of Principal Components Analysis [J].
McVean, Gil .
PLOS GENETICS, 2009, 5 (10)