It's the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension

被引:121
作者
Corley, Martin
MacGregor, Lucy J. [1 ]
Donaldson, David I.
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Philosophy Psychol & Language Sci, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Stirling, Dept Psychol, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
language comprehension; disfluency; speech; ERPs;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.010
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Everyday speech is littered with disfluency, often correlated with the production of less predictable words (e.g., Beattie & Butterworth [Beattie, G., & Butterworth, B. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 22, 201-211]). But what are the effects of disfluency on listeners? In an ERP experiment which compared fluent to disfluent utterances, we established an N400 effect for unpredictable compared to predictable words. This effect, reflecting the difference in ease of integrating words into their contexts, was reduced in cases where the target words were preceded by a hesitation marked by the word er. Moreover, a subsequent recognition memory test showed that words preceded by disfluency were more likely to be remembered. The study demonstrates that hesitation affects the way in which listeners process spoken language, and that these changes are associated with longer-term consequences for the representation of the message. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:658 / 668
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   The old and thee, uh, new - Disfluency and reference resolution [J].
Arnold, JE ;
Tanenhaus, MK ;
Altmann, RJ ;
Fagnano, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (09) :578-582
[2]   Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering [J].
Arnold, JE ;
Wasow, T ;
Losongco, A ;
Ginstrom, R .
LANGUAGE, 2000, 76 (01) :28-55
[3]   Disfluencies affect the parsing of garden-path sentences [J].
Bailey, KGD ;
Ferreira, F .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2003, 49 (02) :183-200
[4]   CONTEXTUAL PROBABILITY AND WORD-FREQUENCY AS DETERMINANTS OF PAUSES AND ERRORS IN SPONTANEOUS SPEECH [J].
BEATTIE, GW ;
BUTTERWORTH, BL .
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 1979, 22 (JUL-) :201-211
[5]   THE FEELING OF ANOTHERS KNOWING - PROSODY AND FILLED PAUSES AS CUES TO LISTENERS ABOUT THE METACOGNITIVE STATES OF SPEAKERS [J].
BRENNAN, SE ;
WILLIAMS, M .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1995, 34 (03) :383-398
[6]   Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking [J].
Clark, HH ;
Tree, JEF .
COGNITION, 2002, 84 (01) :73-111
[7]   Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from eye movements [J].
Dahan, D ;
Magnuson, JS ;
Tanenhaus, MK .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 42 (04) :317-367
[8]   READING SENSELESS SENTENCES - BRAIN POTENTIALS REFLECT SEMANTIC INCONGRUITY [J].
KUTAS, M ;
HILLYARD, SA .
SCIENCE, 1980, 207 (4427) :203-205
[9]   BRAIN POTENTIALS DURING READING REFLECT WORD EXPECTANCY AND SEMANTIC ASSOCIATION [J].
KUTAS, M ;
HILLYARD, SA .
NATURE, 1984, 307 (5947) :161-163
[10]  
LEVELT W, 1989, SPEAKING INTENTION A