Trends in surgical management for acute cholecystitis

被引:73
作者
Csikesz, Nicholas G. [1 ]
Tseng, Jennifer F. [1 ]
Shah, Shimul A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Organ Transplantat, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.033
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. Cholecystectomy, which can be performed, with either a laparoscopic (LC) or open (OC) approach, remains the definitive treatment for acute cholecystitis (AC) in the United States. There has not been an overall evaluation of the safety and efficacy of LC vs. OC as treatment for AC. Methods. We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to identify all patients with AC from 1998-2005. Rates of LC or OC, patient and hospital characteristics, hospital cost, and mortality were analyzed. In order to assess if differences in outcomes exist, propensity scores were created to eliminate differences in cohorts. A case-controlled analysis was then performed, comparing in-hospital mortality and likelihood of conversion. to OC. Results. From approximately 1.8 million admissions for AC, 1.4 million patients underwent cholecystectomy (1,240,212 LC; 147,190 OC) for AC from 1998 to 2005. The number of cholecystectomies increased over time. The ratio of LC per formed increased from 83 % in 1998 to 93 % in 2005; 12 % of cases were attempted laparoscopically but converted to OC. When compared with OC, patients who underwent LC were more likely to be female, carry private insurance, be discharged, to home, have lesser hospital cost per patient, have no comorbid conditions, and have a lesser unadjusted mortality. After adjusting for age, comorbidity and sex, the adjusted odds ratio for death was 4.6 fold greater (95 % CI 4.1-5.1) with OC compared with LC as the treatment for AC. Conclusions. LC is Performed with increasing frequency as the treatment for AC with lesser mortality, hospital stay; and cost compared with OC. Despite differences in-cohorts,. these results support a continued aggressive approach with laparoscopy as the treatment of choice for AC.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 289
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Grootendorst, Paul ;
Anderson, Geoffrey M. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (04) :734-753
[2]   EFFECTIVENESS OF ADJUSTMENT BY SUBCLASSIFICATION IN REMOVING BIAS IN OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRICS, 1968, 24 (02) :295-&
[3]   ASYMMETRIC STRATIFICATION - AN OUTLINE FOR AN EFFICIENT METHOD FOR CONTROLLING CONFOUNDING IN COHORT STUDIES [J].
COOK, EF ;
GOLDMAN, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1988, 127 (03) :626-639
[4]   Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Prospective trial [J].
Eldar, S ;
Sabo, E ;
Nash, E ;
Abrahamson, J ;
Matter, I .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 21 (05) :540-545
[5]   Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data [J].
Elixhauser, A ;
Steiner, C ;
Harris, DR ;
Coffey, RN .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (01) :8-27
[6]   Standardization of surgeon-controlled variables - Impact on outcome in patients with acute cholecystitis [J].
Greenwald, JA ;
McMullen, HF ;
Coppa, GF ;
Newman, RM .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 231 (03) :339-344
[7]  
Hanan EL, 1999, SURGERY, V125, P223
[8]  
Koo KP, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P540
[9]   INCREASED CHOLECYSTECTOMY RATE AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
LEGORRETA, AP ;
SILBER, JH ;
COSTANTINO, GN ;
KOBYLINSKI, RW ;
ZATZ, SL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (12) :1429-1432
[10]   A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy [J].
Livingston, EH ;
Rege, RV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (03) :205-211