Experimental evidence of transport of pesticides through field soils - A review

被引:412
作者
Flury, M
机构
[1] Dept. of Soil and Environ. Sciences, Univ. of California at Riverside, Riverside
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq1996.00472425002500010005x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Much information is available in the literature about pesticide transport through soils at the field scale. The purpose of this study is to review the literature with a focus on pesticide leaching to groundwater. The literature was compiled and discussed with respect to different factors that influence pesticide leaching. Pesticide teaching below the root zone has been demonstrated in sandy as well as in loamy soils. Particularly in loamy soils, there is evidence that even strongly adsorbing chemicals can move along preferential Bow pathways and that the travel times of pesticides are comparable to those of conservative solutes. The amounts of pesticides leached below the root zone by worst case rainfall events depend on the chemical properties and can reach up to 5% of the applied mass. When there is no heavy rainfall shortly following application of chemicals, the mass annually leached below the root zone is in the range of <0.1 to 1%, occasionally it can reach up to 4%. Although a direct comparison cannot be made, the mass lost by leaching seems generally to be smaller than that lost by runoff, depending of course on the slope of the fields. Several factors that affect pesticide leaching, such as surface preparation, soil structure, soil water content, type of irrigation, pesticide formulation, time of application and rainfall events, are discussed with support of experimental evidence. While some factors showed inconsistent effects, others show promise in controlling leaching mechanisms. These latter factors include initial water content, surface preparation, and time of pesticide application. Based on the reviewed literature, recommendations were made for future research activities.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 45
页数:21
相关论文
共 179 条
[1]   FORMATION AND TRANSPORT OF DEETHYLATRAZINE IN THE SOIL AND VADOSE ZONE [J].
ADAMS, CD ;
THURMAN, EM .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1991, 20 (03) :540-547
[2]  
[Anonymous], PERSPECTIVES CHESAPE
[3]  
AUGUSTIJNBECKERS PWM, 1994, REV ENVIRON CONTAM T, V137, P1
[4]   ROLE OF HUMIC CARRIER SUBSTANCES IN DDT MOVEMENT THROUGH FOREST SOIL [J].
BALLARD, TM .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS, 1971, 35 (01) :145-&
[5]   LEACHING POTENTIAL AND DECOMPOSITION OF FLUROXYPYR IN SWEDISH SOILS UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS [J].
BERGSTROM, LF ;
MCGIBBON, AS ;
DAY, SR ;
SNEL, M .
PESTICIDE SCIENCE, 1990, 29 (04) :405-417
[6]  
BEYNON K. I., 1972, Pesticide Science, V3, P401, DOI 10.1002/ps.2780030406
[7]  
BIGGAR JW, 1984, ENVIRON GEOL, V5, P127
[8]   MEASUREMENT AND PREDICTION OF ISOPROTURON MOVEMENT AND PERSISTENCE IN 3 SOILS [J].
BLAIR, AM ;
MARTIN, TD ;
WALKER, A ;
WELCH, SJ .
CROP PROTECTION, 1990, 9 (04) :289-294
[9]   FIELD-TEST OF A MATHEMATICAL-MODEL FOR NON-EQUILIBRIUM TRANSPORT OF PESTICIDES IN SOIL [J].
BOESTEN, JJTI ;
VANDERPAS, LJT ;
SMELT, JH .
PESTICIDE SCIENCE, 1989, 25 (02) :187-203
[10]  
BOTTCHER AB, 1981, T ASAE, V24, P1221, DOI 10.13031/2013.34423