Sensitivity and parameter-estimation precision for alternate LISA configurations

被引:45
作者
Vallisneri, Michele [1 ]
Crowder, Jeff [1 ]
Tinto, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0264-9381/25/6/065005
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We describe a simple framework to assess the LISA scientific performance (more specifically, its sensitivity and expected parameter-estimation precision for prescribed gravitational-wave signals) under the assumption of failure of one or two inter-spacecraft laser measurements (links) and of one to four intra-spacecraft laser measurements. We apply the framework to the simple case of measuring the LISA sensitivity to monochromatic circular binaries, and the LISA parameter-estimation precision for the gravitational-wave polarization angle of these systems. Compared to the six-link baseline configuration, the five-link case is characterized by a small loss in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the high-frequency section of the LISA band; the four-link case shows a reduction by a factor of root 2 at low frequencies, and by up to similar to 2 at high frequencies. The uncertainty in the estimate of polarization, as computed in the Fisher-matrix formalism, also worsens when moving from six to five, and then to four links: this can be explained by the reduced SNR available in those configurations (except for observations shorter than three months, where five and six links do better than four even with the same SNR). In addition, we prove (for generic signals) that the SNR and Fisher matrix are invariant with respect to the choice of a basis of TDI observables; rather, they depend only on which inter-spacecraft and intra-spacecraft measurements are available.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   An overview of the second round of the mock LISA data challenges [J].
Arnaud, K. A. ;
Babak, S. ;
Baker, J. G. ;
Benacquista, M. J. ;
Cornish, N. J. ;
Cutler, C. ;
Finn, L. S. ;
Larson, S. L. ;
Littenberg, T. ;
Porter, E. K. ;
Vallisneri, M. ;
Vecchio, A. ;
Vinet, J-Y .
CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2007, 24 (19) :S551-S564
[2]  
BENDER P, 1998, 233 MPQ
[3]  
BODEWIG E, 1959, MATRIX CALCULUS
[4]   The effects of orbital motion on LISA time delay interferometry [J].
Cornish, NJ ;
Hellings, RW .
CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2003, 20 (22) :4851-4860
[5]   LISA source confusion [J].
Crowder, J ;
Cornish, NJ .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2004, 70 (08)
[6]   Angular resolution of the LISA gravitational wave detector [J].
Cutler, C .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1998, 57 (12) :7089-7102
[7]   Time-delay analysis of LISA gravitational wave data: Elimination of spacecraft motion effects [J].
Estabrook, FB ;
Tinto, M ;
Armstrong, JW .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2000, 62 (04) :art. no.-042002
[8]  
Golub G. H., 1996, MATRIX COMPUTATIONS
[9]  
Huard S., 1997, Polarization of light
[10]   Improving the sensitivity of LISA [J].
Nayak, KR ;
Pai, A ;
Dhurandhar, SV ;
Vinet, JY .
CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2003, 20 (07) :1217-1231