Modulation of sucrose response thresholds in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.):: influence of genotype, feeding, and foraging experience

被引:101
作者
Pankiw, T [1 ]
Waddington, KD
Page, RE
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Entomol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Dept Biol, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Entomol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY | 2001年 / 187卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
honey bee; behavior; neuroethology; response thresholds;
D O I
10.1007/s003590100201
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The perception of sugar is important to honey bees for making foraging decisions. We measured bees' perception by determining what concentration of sucrose touched to the antennae elicited the proboscis extension response (response threshold). A low response threshold (extension at low concentration) suggests a high perceptual value of sucrose, and vice versa. Perception of sucrose solutions differed between two artificially selected genotypic strains and was modulated by the bees' recent feeding experiences. Bees offered 10%, 30%, or 50% sucrose solutions in small cages overnight, and in large flight-cages or free-flying in the field for several days, had subsequent response thresholds positively correlated to the concentration offered. Empty bees, whether they were nectar., water or pollen foragers, dancers or non-dancers, had a significantly lower threshold than loaded bees. Crop volume affected response thresholds directly and independently of sucrose concentration. We interpret these findings as multiple mechanisms that operate in different time scales, modulating perception of sucrose. Changes occurred in the time scale of evolutionary processes as demonstrated by genotypic differences. Changes with foraging experience occur in hours or minutes while effects of crop filling are instantaneous.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 301
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, ANIM BEHAV, DOI DOI 10.1006/ANBE.1993.1167
[2]  
BANSCHBACH VS, 1994, J COMP PHYSIOL A, V175, P107, DOI 10.1007/BF00217441
[3]   CLASSICAL-CONDITIONING OF PROBOSCIS EXTENSION IN HONEYBEES (APIS-MELLIFERA) [J].
BITTERMAN, ME ;
MENZEL, R ;
FIETZ, A ;
SCHAFER, S .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 97 (02) :107-119
[4]  
GARY N E, 1976, Journal of Apicultural Research, V15, P73
[5]  
GARY NE, 1976, 2853 U CAL DIV AGR S
[6]  
Lindauer M., 1961, Communication Among Social Bees
[8]   THE EFFECTS OF COLONY LEVEL SELECTION ON THE SOCIAL-ORGANIZATION OF HONEY-BEE (APIS-MELLIFERA L) COLONIES - COLONY LEVEL COMPONENTS OF POLLEN HOARDING [J].
PAGE, RE ;
FONDRK, MK .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1995, 36 (02) :135-144
[9]   The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) [J].
Page, RE ;
Erber, J ;
Fondrk, MK .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 182 (04) :489-500
[10]   Genetic determinants of honey bee foraging behaviour [J].
Page, RE ;
Waddington, KD ;
Hunt, GJ ;
Fondrk, MK .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1995, 50 :1617-1625