Accuracy of computed tomographic intravenous cholangiography (CT-IVC) with iotroxate in the detection of choledocholithiasis

被引:20
作者
Gibson, RN [1 ]
Vincent, JM
Speer, T
Collier, NA
Noack, K
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Radiol, Melbourne, Vic 3050, Australia
[2] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Melbourne, Vic 3050, Australia
[3] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic 3050, Australia
关键词
computed tomography; bile ducts; intravenous cholangiography; choledocholithiasis;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-004-2606-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To determine the accuracy of computed tomographic intravenous cholangiography (CT-IVC) for detection of choledocholithiasis. Sixty-five patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) underwent CT-IVC prior to ERC, using a single detector helical CT following intravenous infusion of 100 ml iotroxate. Patients with bilirubin levels > 3 times normal were excluded. ERC was indeterminate in three patients (4.7%) and CT-IVC in four (6.3%). Twenty-three patients had ductal calculi at ERC, and CT-IVC was positive in 22, with two false positives and one false negative: sensitivity 95.6%, specificity 94.3%. Stones were multiple in nine and solitary in 14. Of the 14 solitary stones, ten were <= mm and eight were <= mm. The bilirubin level in positive cases was within normal in 20. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) reformats showed stones in only 27% of cases and surface rendered (SR) reformats in none. CT-IVC is highly accurate for detection of ductal calculi, including single small calculi, with a normal or near normal serum bilirubin. Axial images should be used for interpretation rather than MIP or SR reformats.
引用
收藏
页码:1634 / 1642
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Diagnosing choledocholithiasis: How far can we push helical CT? [J].
Baron, RL .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (03) :601-603
[2]  
Berggren P, 1997, BRIT J SURG, V84, P472
[3]   Choledocholithiasis: Comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography [J].
Chan, YL ;
Chan, ACW ;
Lam, WWM ;
Lee, DWH ;
Chung, SSC ;
Sung, JJY ;
Cheung, HS ;
Li, AKC ;
Metreweli, C .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 200 (01) :85-89
[4]   Helical CT cholangiography with oral cholecystographic contrast material [J].
Chopra, S ;
Chintapalli, KN ;
Ramakrishna, K ;
Rhim, H ;
Dodd, GD .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (02) :596-601
[5]   Intravenous cholangiography reduces the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Couse, N ;
Egan, T ;
Delaney, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (03) :335-335
[6]   ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSIS OF CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS - A REAPPRAISAL [J].
CRONAN, JJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1986, 161 (01) :133-134
[7]   Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis:: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography?: A prospective controlled study [J].
de Lédinghen, V ;
Lecesne, R ;
Raymond, JM ;
Gense, V ;
Amouretti, M ;
Drouillard, J ;
Couzigou, P ;
Silvain, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (01) :26-31
[8]   Pitfalls of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) [J].
Fulcher, AS ;
Turner, MA .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1998, 22 (06) :845-850
[9]   Helical CT cholangiography in the evaluation of the biliary tract:: application to the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis [J].
Giadás, TC ;
de Toledo, LSO ;
Asensio, MTMB ;
Cabrejas, RC ;
Ibáñez, IA ;
López, AA ;
García-Asensio, S .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2002, 27 (01) :61-70
[10]  
GRUNSHAW ND, 1993, MINIM INVASIV THER, V2, pS36