Predictability of reformatted computed tomography for pre-operative planning of endosseous implants

被引:61
作者
Jacobs, R [1 ]
Adriansens, A [1 ]
Naert, I [1 ]
Quirynen, M [1 ]
Hermans, R [1 ]
Van Steenberghe, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Fac Med, Dept Periodontol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
tomography; X-ray computed; dental implant; endosseous; jaw;
D O I
10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600403
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Objectives: To determine the reliability of reformatted 2D-CT for pre-operative planning of implant placement. Methods: One hundred consecutive partially or fully edentate patients underwent 2-D reformatted CT pre-operative planning and subsequent implant placement. The number, site and size of the implants, the available bone height and anatomical complications were recorded. The pre-operative planning and the outcome at surgery were compared statistically using a percentage agreement and Kendall's correlation coefficient. Results: Agreement between the pre- and Intra-operative data was good for the number of implants (60%) and the selected sites (70%). From a total of 416 implants planned, 21 implants could not be placed because of intra-operative findings. Agreement was relatively poor for implant size (44%) and anatomical complications (46%). Kendall's correlation coefficient was highest for the number of implants (0.80) and implant sites (0.81). It was much lower for implant sizes (0.51) and did not reach significance for anatomical complications (0.09). Conclusions: Reformatted 2D-CT is reliable for the pre-operative assessment of the number and sites of implants in the jaws. It is less predictable for the implant size needed and poor for anatomical complications.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 41
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]
ADELL R, 1986, TISSUE INTEGRATED PR, P211
[2]
CLINICAL USEFULNESS OF 2-DIMENSIONAL REFORMATTED AND 3-DIMENSIONALLY RENDERED COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHIC-IMAGES - LITERATURE-REVIEW AND A SURVEY OF SURGEONS OPINIONS [J].
ALDER, ME ;
DEAHL, ST ;
MATTESON, SR .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1995, 53 (04) :375-386
[3]
[Anonymous], 1996, ANN PERIODONTOL, V1, P816
[4]
RELIABILITY OF SPIRAL TOMOGRAPHY WITH THE SCANORA(R) TECHNIQUE FOR DENTAL IMPLANT PLANNING [J].
EKESTUBBE, A ;
GRONDAHL, HG .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1993, 4 (04) :195-202
[5]
SPIRAL(HELICAL) CT [J].
HEIKEN, JP ;
BRINK, JA ;
VANNIER, MW .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 189 (03) :647-656
[6]
JACOBS R, 1997, RADIOGRAPHIC PLANNIN
[7]
KLINGE B, 1989, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, V4, P327
[8]
Lindh C, 1992, Clin Oral Implants Res, V3, P90, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030207.x
[9]
PRESURGICAL RADIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT FOR IMPLANTS [J].
PETRIKOWSKI, CG ;
PHAROAH, MJ ;
SCHMITT, A .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1989, 61 (01) :59-64
[10]
QUIRYNEN M, 1990, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, V5, P384