Approach-motivated positive affect reduces breadth of attention

被引:453
作者
Gable, Philip A. [1 ]
Harmon-Jones, Eddie [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Psychol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02112.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Research has found that positive affect broadens attention. However, these studies have manipulated positive affect that is low in approach motivation. Positive affect that is high in approach motivation should reduce the breadth of attention, as organisms shut out irrelevant stimuli as they approach desired objects. Four studies examined the attentional consequences of approach-motivated positive-affect states. Results were consistent with predictions. Participants showed less global attentional focus after viewing high-approach-motivating positive stimuli than after viewing low-approach-motivating positive stimuli (Study 1) or neutral stimuli (Study 2). Study 3 found that greater trait approach motivation resulted in less global attentional focus after participants viewed approach-motivating positive stimuli. Study 4 manipulated affect and approach motivation independently. Greater approach-motivated positive affect caused lower global focus. High-approach-motivated positive affect reduces global attentional focus, whereas low-approach-motivated positive affect increases global attentional focus. Incorporating the intensity of approach motivation into models of positive affect broadens understanding of the consequences of positive affect.
引用
收藏
页码:476 / 482
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
ANDREASEN NC, 1987, AM J PSYCHIAT, V144, P1288
[2]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, NATURE EMOTION FUNDA
[4]   The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience [J].
Berridge, Kent C. .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 191 (03) :391-431
[5]   NEGATIVE AFFECT AND SOCIAL JUDGMENT - THE DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT OF ANGER AND SADNESS [J].
BODENHAUSEN, GV ;
SHEPPARD, LA ;
KRAMER, GP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 24 (01) :45-62
[6]   MEASURING EMOTION - THE SELF-ASSESSMENT MANNEQUIN AND THE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL [J].
BRADLEY, MM ;
LANG, PJ .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 25 (01) :49-59
[7]   THE INTENSITY OF MOTIVATION [J].
BREHM, JW ;
SELF, EA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 40 :109-131
[8]   BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION, BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATION, AND AFFECTIVE RESPONSES TO IMPENDING REWARD AND PUNISHMENT - THE BIS BAS SCALES [J].
CARVER, CS ;
WHITE, TL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (02) :319-333
[9]   Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect [J].
Carver, CS .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2003, 17 (02) :241-261
[10]   THE EFFECT OF EMOTION ON CUE UTILIZATION AND THE ORGANIZATION OF BEHAVIOR [J].
EASTERBROOK, JA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1959, 66 (03) :183-201