Insecure property rights and growth: the role of appropriation costs, wealth effects, and heterogeneity

被引:6
作者
Van Long, N
Sorger, G
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Econ, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Econ, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T7, Canada
关键词
economic growth; strategic saving; differential game; Markov-perfect equilibrium;
D O I
10.1007/s00199-005-0635-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We extend the model from Tornell and Velasco [13] and Tornell and Lane [12] by adding three features: (i) extracting the common property asset involves a private appropriation cost, (ii) agents derive utility from wealth as well as from consumption, and (iii) agents can be heterogeneous. We show that both an increase in the appropriation cost and, when appropriation costs vary across agents, an increase in the degree of heterogeneity of these costs reduce the growth rate of the public capital stock. We also show that, in the interior equilibrium, the private asset can have either a lower or a higher money rate of return than the common property asset.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 529
页数:17
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   SOCIAL NORMS, SAVINGS BEHAVIOR, AND GROWTH [J].
COLE, HL ;
MAILATH, GJ ;
POSTLEWAITE, A .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1992, 100 (06) :1092-1125
[2]  
DUTTA J, 2004, CLEANING UP COMMONS
[3]  
DUTTA J, 2004, ROAD EXTINCTION COMM
[4]   Private storage of common property [J].
Gaudet, G ;
Moreaux, M ;
Salant, SW .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 43 (02) :280-302
[5]   Elephants [J].
Kremer, M ;
Morcom, C .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (01) :212-234
[6]  
Lane P. R., 1996, J ECON GROWTH, V1, P213, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00138863
[7]   Why not Africa? Growth and welfare effects of secure property rights [J].
Lindner, I ;
Strulik, H .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2004, 120 (1-2) :143-167
[9]  
Sorger G., 2005, International Journal of Economic Theory, V1, P3, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1742-7363.2005.00002.X
[10]   THE TRAGEDY OF THE COMMONS AND ECONOMIC-GROWTH - WHY DOES CAPITAL FLOW FROM POOR TO RICH COUNTRIES [J].
TORNELL, A ;
VELASCO, A .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1992, 100 (06) :1208-1231