Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management

被引:311
作者
Dagdeviren, Metin [1 ]
Yueksel, Ihsan [2 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-06570 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Kirikkale Univ, Dept Business Management, TR-71450 Kirikkale, Turkey
关键词
safety management; workplace safety; fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis; analytic hierarchy process; fuzzy linguistic scale;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2007.10.016
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 [计算机科学与技术];
摘要
Safety management (SM) is a very important element within an effective manufacturing organization. One of the most important components of SM is to maintain the safety of work systems in the workplace. Safety of work systems is a function of many factors which affect the system, and these factors affect the safety of work systems simultaneously. For this reason, measuring work system safety needs a holistic approach. In this study, the work safety issue is studied through the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach which allows both multi-criteria and simultaneous evaluation. Another limitation faced in SM is the inability to measure the variables exactly and objectively. Generally, the factors affecting work system safety have non-physical structures. Therefore, the real problem can be represented in a better way by using fuzzy numbers instead of numbers to evaluate these factors. In this study, a fuzzy AHP approach is proposed to determine the level of faulty behavior risk (FBR) in work systems. The proposed method is applied in a real manufacturing company. In the application, factors causing faulty behavior are weighted with triangular fuzzy numbers in pairwise comparisons. These factors are evaluated based on the work system by using these weights and fuzzy linguistic variables. As a result of this evaluation FBR levels of work systems are determined and different studies are planned for work systems according to the FBR levels. In this way, faulty behavior is prevented before occurrence and work system safety is improved. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1717 / 1733
页数:17
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2001, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY
[2]
A combined AHP-GP model for quality control systems [J].
Badri, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2001, 72 (01) :27-40
[3]
BELLAMY LJ, IN PRESS DEV FUNCTIO
[4]
Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems [J].
Bozdag, CE ;
Kahraman, C ;
Ruan, D .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2003, 51 (01) :13-29
[5]
FUZZY HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, JJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (03) :233-247
[6]
A fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach for software development strategy selection [J].
Büyüközkan, G ;
Kahraman, C ;
Ruan, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS, 2004, 33 (2-3) :259-280
[7]
Human factors impact on risk analysis of complex systems [J].
Cacciabue, PC .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2000, 71 (1-3) :101-116
[8]
Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach [J].
Chan, Felix T. S. ;
Kumar, Niraj .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 35 (04) :417-431
[9]
Chang D.-Y, 1992, Extent Analysis and Synthetic Decision, Optimization Techniques and Applications, V1, P352
[10]
Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655