The use of a guide catheter extension system as an aid during transradial percutaneous coronary intervention of coronary artery bypass grafts

被引:31
作者
Farooq, Vasim [1 ]
Mamas, Mamas A. [1 ]
Fath-Ordoubadi, Farzin [1 ]
Fraser, Douglas G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Royal Infirm, Manchester Heart Ctr, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
关键词
transradial PCI; coronary artery bypass graft; guide catheter extension system; backup support; stent delivery; DISTAL STENT DELIVERY; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; FEMORAL APPROACH; PROTECTION; ACCESS; DEVICE; OCTOGENARIANS; METAANALYSIS; ANGIOPLASTY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.22942
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: Prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is one of the main predictors of failure of transradial PCI. Frequently this is due to difficulty in graft cannulation and/or poor backup support. In addition to Proxis's(TM) embolic protection role, the Proxi(TM), Heartrail(TM), and GuideLine(TM) guide catheter extension devices have all been shown to facilitate coronary intervention by increasing backup support and aiding stent delivery. We describe our institution's experiences using these devices to aid transradial graft intervention. Methods: Between October 2007 and March 2010, the utility and safety of these devices were assessed in consecutive transradial graft intervention procedures. Proxis(TM) cases used for proximal protection alone were excluded. Deep intubation was defined as an intubation depth of =2cm. Results: Guide catheter extensions were used in 33 of 41 transradial graft interventions identified. Proxi(TM) was used for proximal protection alone in 3 cases, leaving 30 cases as the study group (Heartrail(TM) n = 18, GuideLiner(TM) n = 3, Proxis(TM) n = 9). In all study cases procedural success with final TIMI-3 flow was achieved. Guide catheter extensions were used to aid during graft cannulation (n = 11), to improve backup support via deep intubation (n = 26) and as an adjunctive aspiration device (n = 11). Filter-based distal embolic protection devices were used in 11/21 Heartrai(TM) and GuideLiner(TM) cases. Deep intubation depths ranged from 30 to 138 mm (mean 61 mm) with no complications related to deep intubation seen. Conclusions: The use of guide catheter extension systems facilitated transradial graft intervention via several mechanisms including aid to graft cannulation, increasing backup support, and as an adjunctive aspiration device. (c) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 863
页数:17
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures - Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials [J].
Agostoni, P ;
Biondi-Zoccai, GGL ;
De Benedictis, ML ;
Rigattieri, S ;
Turri, M ;
Anselmi, M ;
Vassanelli, C ;
Zardini, P ;
Louvard, Y ;
Hamon, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (02) :349-356
[2]   Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts [J].
Baim, DS ;
Wahr, D ;
George, B ;
Leon, MB ;
Greenberg, J ;
Cutlip, DE ;
Kaya, U ;
Popma, JJ ;
Ho, KKL ;
Kuntz, RE .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (11) :1285-1290
[3]   Use of the Proxis embolic protection device for guide anchoring and stent delivery during complex saphenous vein graft interventions [J].
Banerjee, Subhash ;
Brilakis, Emmanouil S. .
CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2009, 10 (03) :183-187
[4]   Novel Uses of the Proxis Embolic Protection Catheter [J].
Brilakis, Emmanouil S. ;
Banerjee, Subhash .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 74 (03) :438-445
[5]   Effect of no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction on six-month mortality [J].
Brosh, David ;
Assali, Abid R. ;
Mager, Aviv ;
Porter, Avital ;
Hasdai, David ;
Teplitsky, Igal ;
Rechavia, Eldad ;
Fuchs, Shmuel ;
Battler, Alexander ;
Kornowski, Ran .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 99 (04) :442-445
[6]   Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the MORTAL study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg) [J].
Chase, A. J. ;
Fretz, E. B. ;
Warburton, W. P. ;
Klinke, W. P. ;
Carere, R. G. ;
Pi, D. ;
Berry, B. ;
Hilton, J. D. .
HEART, 2008, 94 (08) :1019-1025
[7]   Mechanism and Predictors of Failed Transradial Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions [J].
Dehghani, Payam ;
Mohammad, Atif ;
Bajaj, Ravi ;
Hong, Tony ;
Suen, Colin M. ;
Sharieff, Waseem ;
Chisholm, Robert J. ;
Kutryk, Michael J. B. ;
Fam, Neil P. ;
Cheema, Asim N. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (11) :1057-1064
[8]  
Ikari Yuji, 2005, J Invasive Cardiol, V17, P636
[9]  
Ikari Y, 2009, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V21, P570
[10]   Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians [J].
Jaffe, Ronen ;
Hong, Tony ;
Sharieff, Waseem ;
Chisholm, Robert J. ;
Kutryk, Michael J. B. ;
Charron, Thierry ;
Cheema, Asim N. .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2007, 69 (06) :815-820