Is telecommunications regulation efficient? An international perspective

被引:10
作者
Flacher, David [1 ]
Jennequin, Hugues [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 13, CNRS, CEPN, UMR 7115, F-93430 Villetaneuse, France
[2] Univ Rouen, Fac Droit Sci Econ & Gest, F-76186 Rouen 1, France
关键词
telecommunications; economic regulation; competition policy; industrial policy;
D O I
10.1016/j.telpol.2008.02.005
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This article addresses the efficiency of regulation policy in the telecommunications sector. First, the concepts of static and dynamic efficiency are reviewed, with the main policies used into achieve these goals identified, while distinguishing effective competition from industrial policy. Indicators are proposed that enable assessment of components of sector efficiency. These indicators are used to empirically investigate the link between regulation policy and economic performance for OECD Member Countries. The investigation is based on national differences in regulation policy and efficiency indicators. The results support the notion that asymmetrical ex ante regulation alone is not necessarily efficient, and that an ex ante policy, integrating an industrial policy, could favor dynamic efficiency. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 377
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COMMUN STRATEG
[2]  
ARROW K, 1951, READINGS MATH EC
[3]  
*ART, 2005, RAPP PUBL ACT 2004
[4]  
AVERCH H, 1962, AM ECON REV, V52, P1052
[5]  
Baldwin Richard., 2003, Economic Geography and Public Policy
[6]  
Baumol W.J., 1982, CONTESTABLE MARKETS
[7]   Privatization and the sources of performance improvement in the global telecommunications industry [J].
Bortolotti, B ;
D'Souza, J ;
Fantini, M ;
Megginson, WL .
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2002, 26 (5-6) :243-268
[8]   Unbundling the local loop [J].
Bourreau, M ;
Dogan, P .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 49 (01) :173-199
[9]  
BOYLAUD O, 2001, REV EC OCDE, V32
[10]   TRANSACTION COSTS, RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND LIABILITY RULES-A COMMENT [J].
CALABRESI, G .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1968, 11 (APR) :67-73