Variations in treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ in elderly women

被引:27
作者
Gold, HT
Dick, AW
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Dept Publ Hlth, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Sch Med, Dept Community & Prevent Med, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.mlr.0000114915.98256.b4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study is to quantify variation and variability in treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) over time and across registries of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program; to assess diffusion of treatments (breast-conserving surgery [BCS], BCS with radiotherapy, and mastectomy); and to identify correlates of treatment choice. Data: The linked SEER-Medicare database from 1991 to 1996 includes 2701 women aged 65 and older diagnosed with unilateral DCIS. 1990 census data provide socioeconomic variables at the zip-code level, and the 1999 Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care provides number of radiation oncologists. Study Design: Bivariate and multivariate analyses of retrospective cohort data assess factors that explain treatment choice. The multivariate model includes controls for comorbidity, marital status, age, race, education, poverty, rural 5 and radiation oncologists per 100,000 population. Chi-squared tests assess differences in treatment rates by registry and by year. Diffusion of treatments is analyzed by predicting yearly mean treatment rates and yearly variation in treatment rates across geographic areas and over time. Results: There are significant geographic and temporal differences in treatment rates for DCIS with increasing use of BCS alone. Treatment choice is explained by SEER registry, diagnosis year, marital status, race, age, urban/rural status, educational attainment, and number of radiation oncologists. Variability in treatment of DCIS is increasing during the study period. Conclusions: Findings indicate that diagnosis year and socioeconomic factors explain treatment choice for DCIS, but unexplained variation at the geographic-region level remains. Increasing variability in treatment implies continued uncertainty about optimal treatment of DCIS.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 275
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CANC FACTS FIG 2003
[2]  
[Anonymous], DIS BREAST
[3]   Factors associated with surgical and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer in older women [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Potosky, AL ;
Harlan, LC ;
Nayfield, SG ;
Kessler, LG .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1996, 88 (11) :716-726
[4]  
Conover W. J., 1999, PRACTICAL NONPARAMET
[5]   CAN SMALL-AREA ANALYSIS DETECT VARIATION IN SURGERY RATES - THE POWER OF SMALL-AREA VARIATION ANALYSIS [J].
DIEHR, P ;
CAIN, KC ;
KREUTER, W ;
ROSENKRANZ, S .
MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (06) :484-502
[6]   Information on radiation treatment in patients with breast cancer: The advantages of the linked medicare and SEER data [J].
Du, XL ;
Freeman, JL ;
Goodwin, JS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 52 (05) :463-470
[7]   Accuracy and completeness of medicare claims data for surgical treatment of breast cancer [J].
Du, XL ;
Freeman, JL ;
Warren, JL ;
Nattinger, AB ;
Zhang, D ;
Goodwin, JS .
MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (07) :719-727
[8]   Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast [J].
Ernster, VL ;
Barclay, J ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Grady, D ;
Henderson, IC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (12) :913-918
[9]   GEOGRAPHIC-VARIATION IN THE TREATMENT OF LOCALIZED BREAST-CANCER [J].
FARROW, DC ;
HUNT, WC ;
SAMET, JM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (17) :1097-1101
[10]  
Fienberg Stephen E., 1980, The Analysis of Cross-Classi?ed Categorical Data