Measuring effectiveness for best evidence medical education: a discussion

被引：76

作者：

Belfield, C ^{[1
]}

Thomas, H ^{[1
]}

Bullock, A ^{[1
]}

Eynon, R ^{[1
]}

Wall, D ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Columbia Univ, Teachers Coll, New York, NY 10027 USA

来源：

MEDICAL TEACHER | 2001年 / 23卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1080/0142150020031084

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

This paper considers how educational interventions should be evaluated for their effectiveness. Five levels a effectiveness are clarified and illustrated: outcomes, behaviour, learning, reaction and participation. These levels are then discussed, within the context of research evidence for education within the medical profession. Methodological and practical research conclusions are then drawn. From an analysis of over 300 abstracts the evidence shows that only limited research on healthcare outcomes has been undertaken, and there is considerable ambiguity over what constitutes an effectiveness measure. The benefits of a consistent set of terms are then considered. Finally, five key messages are distilled from the discussion and summarized.

引用

页码：164 / 170

页数：7

共 33 条

[1]

Allery LA, 1997, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V314, P870

[2]

[Anonymous], 1995, Identification Problems in the Social Sciences

[3]

ASPEGREN K, 1999, MED TEACH, V21, P3

[4]

Behrman J.R., 1997, The social benefits of education

[5]

BELFIELD CR, 2000, UNPUB PRELIMINARY RE

[6]

BISHOP J, 1989, ECON EDUC REV, V8, P1

[7]

Bittel LR., 1967, TRAINING DEV HDB

[8]

BROWN C, 2000, UNPUB COST EFFECTIVE

[9]

Campbell JK, 1999, BRIT MED J, V318, P1272

[10] RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 3 APPROACHES FOR MARKETING SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAMS TO AUSTRALIAN GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS [J].

COCKBURN, J ;

RUTH, D ;

SILAGY, C ;

DOBBIN, M ;

REID, Y ;

SCOLLO, M ;

NACCARELLA, L .

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 304 (6828) :691-694

← 1 2 3 4 →