Weighted subspace fitting for general array error models

被引:52
作者
Jansson, M [1 ]
Swindlehurst, AL
Ottersten, B
机构
[1] Royal Inst Technol KTH, Dept Signals Sensors & Syst, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
antenna arrays; array signal processing; direction-of-arrival estimation; error analysis; parameter estimation; robustness;
D O I
10.1109/78.709536
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Model error sensitivity is an issue common to all high-resolution direction-of-arrival estimators. Much attention has been directed to the design of algorithms for minimum variance estimation taking only finite sample errors into account. Approaches to reduce the sensitivity due to army calibration errors have also appeared in the literature. Herein, one such approach is adopted that assumes that the errors due to finite samples and model errors are of comparable size. A weighted subspace fitting method for very general array perturbation models is derived. This method provides minimum variance estimates under the assumption that the prior distribution of the perturbation model is known. Interestingly, the method reduces to the WSF (MODE) estimator if no model errors are present, Vice versa, assuming that model errors dominate, the method specializes to the corresponding "model-errors-only subspace fitting method." Unlike previous techniques for model errors, the estimator can be implemented using a two-step procedure if the nominal array is uniform and linear, and it is also consistent even if the signals are fully correlated. The paper also contains a large sample analysis of one of the alternative methods, namely, MAPprox, It is shown that MAPprox also provides minimum variance estimates under reasonable assumptions.
引用
收藏
页码:2484 / 2498
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P ICASSP
[2]  
BOHME JF, 1986, SIGNAL PROCESS, V10, P329
[3]   EXACT MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD PARAMETER-ESTIMATION OF SUPERIMPOSED EXPONENTIAL SIGNALS IN NOISE [J].
BRESLER, Y ;
MACOVSKI, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ACOUSTICS SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1986, 34 (05) :1081-1089
[4]   PERFORMANCE OF HIGH-RESOLUTION FREQUENCIES ESTIMATION METHODS COMPARED TO THE CRAMER-RAO BOUNDS [J].
CLERGEOT, H ;
TRESSENS, S ;
OUAMRI, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ACOUSTICS SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1989, 37 (11) :1703-1720
[6]  
FLEILLER A, 1995, P ICAASP DETROIT MI, P1884
[7]   EFFECTS OF MODEL ERRORS ON WAVE-FORM ESTIMATION USING THE MUSIC ALGORITHM [J].
FRIEDLANDER, B ;
WEISS, AJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1994, 42 (01) :147-155
[8]   SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD DIRECTION-FINDING ALGORITHM [J].
FRIEDLANDER, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 1990, 26 (06) :953-968
[9]   A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE MUSIC ALGORITHM [J].
FRIEDLANDER, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ACOUSTICS SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1990, 38 (10) :1740-1751
[10]  
Graham A., 2018, KRONECKER PRODUCTS M