The unidirectional valve is the best method to determine maximal inspiratory pressure during weaning

被引:55
作者
Caruso, P [1 ]
Friedrich, C [1 ]
Denari, SDC [1 ]
Al Ruiz, S [1 ]
Deheinzelin, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Unidade Terapia Intens, Ctr Tratamento & Pesquisa Hosp Canc, Hosp AC Camargo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
maximal inspiratory pressure; mechanical ventilation; respiratory monitoring; respiratory muscle; ventilator weaning;
D O I
10.1378/chest.115.4.1096
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: Although maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) is used as an index of inspiratory muscular strength, there is no consensus on how to measure it. We compared, during weaning from mechanical ventilation, two methods of measurement to determine which shows the greater values (MIPbest) and is more reproducible, One method measured MIP when negative pressure was maintained for at least 1 s after a forceful expiration, and the other method measured MIP with a unidirectional expiratory valve (MIPuni), Design: The study had a crossover design, and patients randomly performed three measurements of each method (t1), The procedure was repeated by the same observer after 20 min (t2), The maximal value in each method was considered, Setting: ICU, Hospital A.C. Camargo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Patients: Fifty-four consecutive patients undergoing short-term mechanical ventilation who became eligible for the study when their physicians decided to restore spontaneous breathing. Results: MIPbest values were arrived at using MIPuni 75% of the time either in tl or t2, MIPuni yielded a higher average of MIPbest values in tl and t2 (p < 0.0001). The effort-to-effort coefficient of variation of one method compared with the other during tl and t2 was similar (p > 0.2 for tl; p > 0.8 for t2), Also, when comparing tl and t2, the coefficients of variation were similar for each method (p > 0.62), Conclusions: Because MIPuni displayed the maximal values, if is the best method for estimating MIP in patients undergoing short-term mechanical ventilation. The reproducibility of consecutive measurements was similar between the methods, even after a short period of time.
引用
收藏
页码:1096 / 1101
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   MAXIMAL INSPIRATORY PRESSURE - DOES REPRODUCIBILITY INDICATE FULL EFFORT [J].
ALDRICH, TK ;
SPIRO, P .
THORAX, 1995, 50 (01) :40-43
[2]  
BLACK LF, 1969, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V99, P696
[3]  
BLACK LF, 1971, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V103, P641
[4]  
BRANSON R D, 1989, Respiratory Care, V34, P789
[5]  
CAPDELIA XJ, 1995, CHEST, V8, P482
[7]   RESPIRATORY MUSCLE STRENGTH IN THE ELDERLY - CORRELATES AND REFERENCE VALUES [J].
ENRIGHT, PL ;
KRONMAL, RA ;
MANOLIO, TA ;
SCHENKER, MB ;
HYATT, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 149 (02) :430-438
[8]   COMPARISON OF STANDARD WEANING PARAMETERS AND THE MECHANICAL WORK OF BREATHING IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS [J].
FIASTRO, JF ;
HABIB, MP ;
SHON, BY ;
CAMPBELL, SC .
CHEST, 1988, 94 (02) :232-238
[9]   HOW MANY MANEUVERS SHOULD BE DONE TO MEASURE MAXIMAL INSPIRATORY MOUTH PRESSURE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC AIR-FLOW OBSTRUCTION [J].
FIZ, JA ;
MONTSERRAT, JM ;
PICADO, C ;
PLAZA, V ;
AGUSTIVIDAL, A .
THORAX, 1989, 44 (05) :419-421
[10]   BREAKING POINT OF BREATH-HOLDING [J].
FOWLER, WS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1954, 6 (09) :539-545