Long-Term Follow-Up on Soft and Hard Tissue Levels Following Guided Bone Regeneration Treatment in Combination with a Xenogeneic Filling Material: A 5-Year Prospective Clinical Study

被引:39
作者
Dahlin, C. [1 ,2 ]
Simion, M. [3 ]
Hatano, N. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Biomat, Inst Surg Sci, Sahlgrenska Acad, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] NAL Med Ctr Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Trollhattan, Sweden
[3] Univ Milan, Fac Odontol, Dept Periodontol, Milan, Italy
[4] MAXIS Implant Ctr, Urawa, Saitama, Japan
关键词
Bio-Oss (R); biodegradable membranes; bone augmentation; bovine hydroxyapatite; e-PTFE; guided bone regeneration; implants; membranes; VERTICAL RIDGE AUGMENTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; MEMBRANE; DEFECTS; BIO-OSS(R); EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00163.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
100302 [口腔临床医学];
摘要
Purpose: In the present prospective study, bone augmentation by guided bone regeneration (GBR) in combination with bovine hydroxyapatite (BHA) as filling material was evaluated with regard to soft and hard tissue stability over time. Materials and Methods: Implant survival, radiologic bone level (marginal bone level [MBL]), and clinical soft tissue parameters (marginal soft tissue level [MSTL]) were observed. Twenty patients received a total of 41 implants (Branemark System, Nobel Biocare, Goteborg, Sweden) in conjunction with GBR treatment. The end point of the study was after 5 years following implant placement. Results: The cumulative implant survival rate was 97.5% corresponding to one implant failure. The radiologic evaluation of the MBL demonstrated a crestal bone height above the level of the fixture head. The bone height decreased from -3.51 to -2.38 mm (p < .001). The MSTL was -1.52 mm at baseline and -1.15 mm at the 5-year follow-up (p < .04) demonstrating a stable submucosal crown margin throughout the study period. Conclusion: GBR treatment in combination with a xenogeneic filling material (BHA) is a viable treatment option in order to maintain stable hard and soft tissue levels in conjunction with augmentative procedure related to oral implant treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 270
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]
The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems - A comparative study in the dog [J].
Abrahamsson, I ;
Berglundh, T ;
Wennstrom, J ;
Lindhe, J .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1996, 7 (03) :212-219
[2]
Abrahamsson I, 2001, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V16, P323
[3]
Abrahamsson Ingemar, 2003, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V5, P82, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00188.x
[4]
Aghaloo TL, 2007, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V22, P49
[5]
Albrektsson T, 1986, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V1, P11
[6]
Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation [J].
Araujo, Mauricio G. ;
Wennstroem, Jan L. ;
Lindhe, Jan .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (06) :606-614
[7]
Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction.: An experimental study in the dog [J].
Araújo, MG ;
Lindhe, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 32 (02) :212-218
[8]
Five-year prospective follow-up report of the Astra Tech Dental Implant System in the treatment of edentulous mandibles [J].
Arvidson, K ;
Bystedt, H ;
Frykholm, A ;
von Konow, L ;
Lothigius, E .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (04) :225-234
[9]
BERGLUNDH T, 1998, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V9, P429
[10]
Oxidized titanium implants in reconstructive jaw surgery [J].
Brechter, M ;
Nilson, H ;
Lundgren, S .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2005, 7 :S83-S87