Long-term treatment with losartan versus atenolol improves insulin sensitivity in hypertension: ICARUS, a LIFE substudy

被引:49
作者
Olsen, MH [1 ]
Fossum, E
Hoieggen, A
Wachtell, K
Hjerkinn, E
Nesbitt, SD
Andersen, UB
Phillips, RA
Gaboury, CL
Ibsen, H
Kjeldsen, SE
Julius, S
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Glostrup Hosp, Dept Clin Physiol & Nucl Med, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Glostrup Hosp, Dept Internal Med, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark
[3] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Oslo, Norway
[4] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ Michigan, Ctr Med, Div Hypertens, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Hypertens Sect, New York, NY 10029 USA
[7] Clin Res Grp Oregon, Portland, OR USA
关键词
essential hypertension; insulin resistance; hypertrophy; vascular resistance; angiotensin antagonist; losartan; adrenergic receptor blocker;
D O I
10.1097/01.hjh.0000163160.60234.15
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective Hypertension and insulin resistance might be associated through peripheral vascular hypertrophy/rarefaction which compromises skeletal muscle blood flow and decreases glucose uptake, inducing insulin resistance. We hypothesized that treatment with losartan as compared to atenolol would improve insulin sensitivity through regression of peripheral vascular hypertrophy/rarefaction. Methods In 70 hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy, we measured minimal forearm vascular resistance (MFVR) by plethysmography and insulin sensitivity (M/IG) by a 2-h isoglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp at baseline and after 1, 2 and 3 years of blinded treatment with atenolol- or losartan-based regimens. Results Blood pressures were reduced similarly in the two treatment groups. After 3 years, MFVR was increased (3.7 versus 3.2 mmHg x min x 100, P < 0.05) and M/IG decreased (8.6 versus 12.1 l(2)/kg x mmol x min, P < 0.05) in patients treated with atenolol, whereas MFVR and M/IG were unchanged (3.5 versus 3.5 mmHg x min x 100 and 12.6 versus 11.1 l(2)/kg x mmol x min, both P = NS) in patients treated with losartan. As compared to atenolol, losartan treatment was associated with less increase in MFVR (4.3 versus 27%, P < 0.05) and less decrease in M/IG (24 versus -14%, P < 0.01). The relative change in M/IG was inversely associated with the relative change in MFVR (r = -0.16, P < 0.05) independently of the relative change in body mass index (r = -0.29, P < 0.001). Conclusions As compared to atenolol, losartan treatment was associated with less peripheral vascular hypertrophy/rarefaction and higher insulin sensitivity. The relative change in MFVR and M/IG were inversely related, supporting the hypothesis that peripheral vascular changes in hypertension may induce insulin resistance. The ability of losartan to preserve insulin sensitivity may explain the lower incidence of new onset diabetes in patients treated with losartan in the LIFE study. (c) 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 898
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   INSULIN SENSITIVITY IN THE INTACT ORGANISM [J].
ADER, M ;
BERGMAN, RN .
BAILLIERES CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 1987, 1 (04) :879-910
[2]  
ANDERSEN L, 1993, CLIN CHEM, V39, P578
[3]   Structural skin capillary rarefaction in essential hypertension [J].
Antonios, TFT ;
Singer, DRJ ;
Markandu, ND ;
Mortimer, PS ;
MacGregor, GA .
HYPERTENSION, 1999, 33 (04) :998-1001
[4]   βAR signaling required for diet-induced thermogenesis and obesity resistance [J].
Bachman, ES ;
Dhillon, H ;
Zhang, CY ;
Cinti, S ;
Bianco, AC ;
Kobilka, BK ;
Lowell, BB .
SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5582) :843-845
[5]   INSULIN-MEDIATED SKELETAL-MUSCLE VASODILATION CONTRIBUTES TO BOTH INSULIN SENSITIVITY AND RESPONSIVENESS IN LEAN HUMANS [J].
BARON, AD ;
STEINBERG, HO ;
CHAKER, H ;
LEAMING, R ;
JOHNSON, A ;
BRECHTEL, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1995, 96 (02) :786-792
[6]  
Boudier HAJS, 1999, DRUGS, V58, P37
[7]   Vasodilatation, not hypotension, improves resistance vessel design during treatment of essential hypertension: a literature survey [J].
Christensen, KL ;
Mulvany, MJ .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2001, 19 (06) :1001-1006
[8]   THE BLOOD FLOW IN SKIN AND MUSCLE OF THE HUMAN FOREARM [J].
COOPER, KE ;
EDHOLM, OG ;
MOTTRAM, RF .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1955, 128 (02) :258-267
[9]   Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE):: a randomised trial against atenolol [J].
Dahlöf, B ;
Devereux, RB ;
Kjeldsen, SE ;
Julius, S ;
Beevers, G ;
de Faire, U ;
Fyhrquist, F ;
Ibsen, H ;
Kristiansson, K ;
Lederballe-Pedersen, O ;
Lindholm, LH ;
Nieminen, MS ;
Omvik, P ;
Oparil, S ;
Wedel, H .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9311) :995-1003
[10]   Characteristics of 9194 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy -: The LIFE study [J].
Dahlöf, B ;
Devereux, RB ;
Julius, S ;
Kjeldsen, SE ;
Beevers, G ;
de Faire, U ;
Fyhrquist, F ;
Hedner, T ;
Ibsen, H ;
Kristianson, K ;
Lederballe-Pedersen, O ;
Lindholm, LH ;
Nieminen, MS ;
Omvik, P ;
Oparil, S ;
Wedel, H .
HYPERTENSION, 1998, 32 (06) :989-997