Evaluation of knowledge management tools using AHP

被引：169

作者：

Ngai, EWT ^{[1
]}

Chan, EWC ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Management & Mkt, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China

来源：

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS | 2005年 / 29卷 / 04期

关键词：

analytic hierarchy process; knowledge management; knowledge management tools;

D O I：

10.1016/j.eswa.2005.06.025

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

This paper presents an application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) used to select the most appropriate tool to support knowledge management (KM). This method adopts a multi-criteria approach that can be used to analyse and compare KM tools in the software market. The method is based on pairwise comparisons between several factors that affect the selection of the most appropriate KM tool. An AHP model is formulated and applied to a real case of assisting decision-makers in a leading communications company in Hong Kong to evaluate a suitable KM tool. We believe that the application shown can be of use to managers and that, because of its ease of implementation, others can benefit from this approach. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：889 / 899

页数：11

共 47 条

[1] Review:: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems:: Conceptual foundations and research issues
Alavi, M
Leidner, DE
[J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 2001, 25 (01) : 107 - 136
[2] ALAVI M, 1999, COMMUNICATION AIS, V1, P21
[3] [Anonymous], INFORM MANAGEMENT J
[4] Building knowledge management systems
Bowman, BJ
[J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2002, 19 (03) : 32 - 40
[5] Byun D. H., 1996, J END USER COMPUTING, V8, P31
[6] The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model
Byun, DH
[J]. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2001, 38 (05) : 289 - 297
[7] CONWAY S, 2002, UNLOCK ING KNOWLEDGE
[8] Davis L., 1994, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, V5, P23, DOI 10.1108/09576069410050314
[9] ENGLISH B, 2003, ADM GUIDE SHARE POIN
[10] Knowledge management systems: surveying the landscape
Gallupe, B
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2001, 3 (01) : 61 - 77

← 1 2 3 4 5 →