Economics of dairy waste use as fertilizer in central Texas

被引:22
作者
Adhikari, M
Paudel, KP
Martin, NR
Gauthier, WM
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Alabama A&M Univ, Normal, AL 35762 USA
[3] Auburn Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Sociol, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2005.06.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Dairy manure is an unavoidable natural, but negative, byproduct of milk production. Its nitrogen, phosphate, and potash contents represent a potential substitute for commercial fertilizers on field crops. In the absence of subsidies, manure transportation and land application costs limit its utilization as a substitute for chemical fertilizer. The results from a study of the economics of manure use in Central Texas suggest that, at the current costs for loading, hauling, and spreading, dairy manure cannot be economically transported from surplus to deficit areas within the study area. The estimated breakeven transport distance for manure application to four crops varied from 28 to 41 km; however, the distances between manure-surplus and manure-deficit counties in the study region varied from 40 to 90 km. An analysis of potential subsidies paid by the government or dairy farmers showed that the breakeven distance could increase by up to 30 km. A decrease in the assumed moisture content of the manure from 50% to 40% is shown to increase the breakeven distance by 10 km. The study suggests that dairy manure loading, transportation, and land application, with appropriate subsidies or reductions in moisture content, has the potential to be profitably substituted for chemical fertilizers. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / 1074
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, CENS AGR
[2]  
BOSCH DJ, 1992, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V47, P342
[3]  
Fleming R. A., 1998, Review of Agricultural Economics, V20, P96, DOI 10.2307/1349536
[4]  
Govindasamy R., 1995, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, V24, P101
[5]  
Janzen RA, 1999, T ASAE, V42, P1261, DOI 10.13031/2013.13291
[6]   THE POTENTIAL FOR BENEFICIAL REUSE OF SEWAGE-SLUDGE AND COAL COMBUSTION BY-PRODUCTS [J].
KRIESEL, W ;
MCINTOSH, CS ;
MILLER, WP .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1994, 42 (04) :299-315
[7]  
NORVELL S, 1998, TIAER INFORM B
[8]   Environmental benefits and economic costs of manure incorporation on dairy waste application fields [J].
Osei, E ;
Gassman, PW ;
Hauck, LM ;
Jones, R ;
Beran, L ;
Dyke, PT ;
Goss, DW ;
Flowers, JD ;
McFarland, AMS ;
Saleh, A .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2003, 68 (01) :1-11
[9]   Economic and environmental impacts of pasture nutrient management [J].
Osei, E ;
Gassman, PW ;
Hauck, LM ;
Neitsch, S ;
Jones, RD ;
McNitt, J ;
Jones, H .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 2003, 56 (03) :218-226
[10]  
Paudel K. P., 2002, Journal of Environmental Systems, V29, P311, DOI 10.2190/F1W9-91QJ-L23V-G507