Detection of Abnormal Glucose Tolerance in Africans Is Improved by Combining A1C With Fasting Glucose: The Africans in America Study

被引:40
作者
Sumner, Anne E. [1 ]
Thoreson, Caroline K. [1 ]
O'Connor, Michelle Y. [1 ]
Ricks, Madia [1 ]
Chung, Stephanie T. [1 ]
Tulloch-Reid, Marshall K. [2 ]
Lozier, Jay N. [3 ]
Sacks, David B. [3 ]
机构
[1] NIDDK, Diabet Endocrinol & Obes Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Univ W Indies, Res Inst Trop Med, Kingston 7, Jamaica
[3] NIH, Dept Lab Med, Ctr Clin, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
LIFE-STYLE INTERVENTION; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK-FACTORS; SICKLE-CELL TRAIT; US POPULATION; HEMOGLOBIN-C; FOLLOW-UP; PREVALENCE; REDUCTION; IMMIGRANT; HBA(1C);
D O I
10.2337/dc14-1179
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVEAbnormal glucose tolerance is rising in sub-Saharan Africa. Hemoglobin A(1c) by itself and in combination with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) is used to diagnose abnormal glucose tolerance. The diagnostic ability of A1C in Africans with heterozygous variant hemoglobin, such as sickle cell trait or hemoglobin C trait, has not been rigorously evaluated. In U.S.-based Africans, we determined by hemoglobin status the sensitivities of 1) FPG 5.6 mmol/L, 2) A1C 5.7% (39 mmol/mol), and 3) FPG combined with A1C (FPG 5.6 mmol/L and/or A1C 5.7% [39 mmol/mol]) for the detection of abnormal glucose tolerance.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSAn oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed in 216 African immigrants (68% male, age 37 10 years [mean SD], range 20-64 years). Abnormal glucose tolerance was defined as 2-h glucose 7.8 mmol/L.RESULTSVariant hemoglobin was identified in 21% (46 of 216). Abnormal glucose tolerance occurred in 33% (72 of 216). When determining abnormal glucose tolerance from the OGTT (2-h glucose 7.8 mmol/L), sensitivities of FPG for the total, normal, and variant hemoglobin groups were 32%, 32%, and 33%, respectively. Sensitivities for A1C were 53%, 54%, and 47%. For FPG and A1C combined, sensitivities were 64%, 63%, and 67%. Sensitivities for FPG and A1C and the combination did not vary by hemoglobin status (all P > 0.6). For the entire cohort, sensitivity was higher for A1C than FPG and for both tests combined than for either test alone (all P values 0.01).CONCLUSIONSNo significant difference in sensitivity of A1C by variant hemoglobin status was detected. For the diagnosis of abnormal glucose tolerance in Africans, the sensitivity of A1C combined with FPG is significantly superior to either test alone.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 219
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[2]   Executive Summary: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2014 [J].
不详 .
DIABETES CARE, 2014, 37 :S5-S13
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Diabetes Care, V33 Suppl 1, pS3, DOI 10.2337/dc10-S003
[4]  
[Anonymous], HbA1c assay interferences
[5]  
[Anonymous], CLIN CHEM LAB MED
[6]   Pathogenetic Mechanisms and Cardiovascular Risk Differences between HbA1c and oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of glucose tolerance [J].
Bianchi, Cristina ;
Miccoli, Roberto ;
Bonadonna, Riccardo C. ;
Giorgino, Francesco ;
Frontoni, Simona ;
Faloia, Emanuela ;
Marchesini, Giulio ;
Dolci, Maria A. ;
Cavalot, Franco ;
Cavallo, Gisella M. ;
Leonetti, Frida ;
Del Prato, Stefano .
DIABETES CARE, 2012, 35 (12) :2607-2612
[7]  
Boston Ray C, 2003, Diabetes Technol Ther, V5, P1003, DOI 10.1089/152091503322641060
[8]  
Bry L, 2001, CLIN CHEM, V47, P153
[9]   Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in adults in the US population - National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002 [J].
Cowie, Catherine C. ;
Engelgau, Michael M. ;
Rust, Keith F. ;
Saydah, Sharon H. ;
Byrd-Holt, Danita D. ;
Williams, Desmond E. ;
Eberhardt, Mark S. ;
Geiss, Linda S. ;
Flegal, Katherine M. ;
Gregg, Edward W. .
DIABETES CARE, 2006, 29 (06) :1263-1268
[10]   Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the US Population in 1988-2006 [J].
Cowie, Catherine C. ;
Rust, Keith F. ;
Byrd-Holt, Danita D. ;
Gregg, Edward W. ;
Ford, Earl S. ;
Geiss, Linda S. ;
Bainbridge, Kathleen E. ;
Fradkin, Judith E. .
DIABETES CARE, 2010, 33 (03) :562-568