Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions

被引:631
作者
Wallace, Ken J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nat Resources Branch, Dept Environm & Conservat, Bentley, WA 6983, Australia
关键词
biodiversity planning; ecosystem services; natural resource management; decision-making values; BIODIVERSITY; VALUATION; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; ECONOMICS; ECOLOGY; RESOURCES; DIVERSITY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecosystem values are not well accounted for in decisions concerning natural resources. in this context, the concept of ecosystem services offers an important opportunity to develop a framework to underpin the wise use of biodiversity and other natural resources. Although the merit of using ecosystem services to frame biodiversity evaluations has been documented, the classification systems employed mix processes (means) for achieving services and the services themselves (ends) within the same classification category. This limits their contribution to decisions concerning biodiversity. Ambiguity in the definitions of key terms - such as ecosystem processes, functions and services - exacerbates this situation. After clarifying definitions and discussing the basic components of an effective typology, this paper develops a classification of ecosystem services that. provides a framework for decisions in natural resource management. However, further work is still required to resolve particular issues, such as the classification of socio-cultural services. Although science can contribute to effective decisions by clearly classifying services and describing their links to processes, final decisions concerning biodiversity and other natural resources are inevitably socio-political, and embedded within a particular cultural context. Crown Copyright (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 246
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
ABEL S, 2003, NATURAL VALUES EXPLO
[2]  
Andrewartha H.G., 1971, Introduction to the Study of Animal Populations, Vsecond
[3]   BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY VERSUS BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AS POLICY DIRECTIVES - PROTECTING BIOTIC RESOURCES [J].
ANGERMEIER, PL ;
KARR, JR .
BIOSCIENCE, 1994, 44 (10) :690-697
[4]  
Anielski M., 2005, Counting Canada's natural capital: Assessing the real value of Canada's Boreal ecosystems
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Risks and decisions for conservation and environmental management
[6]  
[Anonymous], PRESERVATION SPECIES
[7]  
BINNING C, 2001, NATURAL ASSESTS INVE
[8]   Species, data, and conservation planning [J].
Brooks, T ;
da Fonseca, GAB ;
Rodrigues, ASL .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (06) :1682-1688
[9]   THE CONCEPT OF VALUE IN RESOURCE-ALLOCATION [J].
BROWN, TC .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1984, 60 (03) :231-246
[10]  
Burgman M.A., 1998, CONSERVATION BIOL AU