Legal Reform and Loan Repayment: The Microeconomic Impact of Debt Recovery Tribunals in India

被引:84
作者
Visaria, Sujata [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Dept Econ, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
FINANCE; LAW;
D O I
10.1257/app.1.3.59
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In 1993, the Indian government introduced debt recovery tribunals to speed up the resolution of debt recovery claims larger than a threshold. This paper exploits the staggered introduction of tribunals across states and the link between overdues and claim size to implement a differences-in-differences strategy on project loan data. It finds that the tribunals reduced delinquency for the average loan by 28 percent. They also lowered the interest rates charged on larger loans, holding constant borrower quality. This suggests that the speedier processing of debt recovery suits can lower the cost of credit. (JEL G21, K41, O16, O17)
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 81
页数:23
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Bardhan Pranab., 1999, Development Microeconomics
[2]  
BERKOWITZ, 2004, SMALL FIRMS, V35, P69
[3]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[4]  
BIANCO M, 2002, 58 CTR STUD EC FIN
[5]   COLLATERAL AND COMPETITIVE EQUILIBRIA WITH MORAL HAZARD AND PRIVATE INFORMATION [J].
CHAN, YS ;
THAKOR, AV .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1987, 42 (02) :345-363
[6]  
CHANG T, 2007, UNPUB EFFECT JUDICIA, pCH11
[7]  
CHEMIN M, 2007, 0725 CTR INT RISQ PO
[8]  
COSTA ANA, 2006, 12252 NAT BUR EC
[9]  
Dakolias M., 1999, Court performance around the world: A comparative perspective
[10]   Law, finance, and firm growth [J].
Demirguc-Kunt, A ;
Maksimovic, V .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1998, 53 (06) :2107-2137