Genotypic differences among plant species in response to aluminum stress

被引:30
作者
Yang, JL
Zheng, SJ [1 ]
He, YF
Tang, CX
Zhou, GD
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Environm & Resources Sci, Dept Resource Sci, Hangzhou 310029, Peoples R China
[2] La Trobe Univ, Dept Agr Sci, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
[3] Hangzhou Normal Coll, Fac Life Sci, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
aluminum resistance; buckwheat; genotypic difference; rye; triticale; wheat;
D O I
10.1081/PLN-200058884
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Genotypic differences in aluminum (Al) resistance in rye ( Secale cereale L.), triticale ( X Triticosecale Wittmack), wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), and buckwheat (Fygopyrum esculentum Moench) were examined using a compartmental hydroponic system. Four-day-old seedlings were grown for 24 h in 0.5 mM CaCl2 ( pH 4.5) containing 0 or 50 mu M Al. Relative root elongation (RRE) at 50 mu M Al. ( as a percentage of that at 0 Al) was used as the index of Al resistance. On average, rye exhibited the highest Al resistance, followed by buckwheat, triticale, and wheat. However, triticale displayed the greatest genotypic differences. Al content in the root tips of triticale breeding lines negatively correlated with RRE ( r = 0.5, P < 0.01), implying that the Al exclusion mechanism contributed to Al resistance. Furthermore, high Al resistance in buckwheat correlated well with the growth habitats of buckwheat, indicating that adaptation mechanisms giving good Al resistance have evolved in buckwheat. All of these results suggested that it is possible to obtain greater Al resistance in plants by screening current existing cultivars. The selection of new cultivars with increased Al resistance and sensitivity will provide important material for further studies exploring Al phytotoxic and resistant mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 961
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   ALUMINUM TOLERANCE OF SPRING RYE INBRED LINES [J].
ANIOL, A ;
HILL, RD ;
LARTER, EN .
CROP SCIENCE, 1980, 20 (02) :205-208
[2]   ALUMINUM TOLERANCE IN WHEAT - CORRELATING HYDROPONIC EVALUATIONS WITH FIELD AND SOIL PERFORMANCES [J].
BAIER, AC ;
SOMERS, DJ ;
GUSTAFSON, JP .
PLANT BREEDING, 1995, 114 (04) :291-296
[3]  
BAIER AC, 1998, RED DEER, V2, P285
[4]   Advances in the understanding of aluminum toxicity and the development of aluminum-tolerant transgenic plants [J].
De la Fuente-Martínez, JM ;
Herrera-Estrella, L .
ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 66, 1999, 66 :103-120
[5]   Classification of Brazilian wheat cultivars for aluminium toxicity in acid soils [J].
de Sousa, CNA .
PLANT BREEDING, 1998, 117 (03) :217-221
[6]   ALUMINUM TOLERANCE IN WHEAT (TRITICUM-AESTIVUM L) .1. UPTAKE AND DISTRIBUTION OF ALUMINUM IN ROOT APICES [J].
DELHAIZE, E ;
CRAIG, S ;
BEATON, CD ;
BENNET, RJ ;
JAGADISH, VC ;
RANDALL, PJ .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 103 (03) :685-693
[8]   The role of ethylene metabolism in the short-term responses to aluminium by roots of two maize cultivars different in Al-resistance [J].
Gunsé, B ;
Poschenrieder, C ;
Barceló, J .
ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2000, 43 (01) :73-81
[9]   MOLECULAR ASPECTS OF ALUMINUM TOXICITY [J].
HAUG, A .
CRC CRITICAL REVIEWS IN PLANT SCIENCES, 1984, 1 (04) :345-373
[10]   Does aluminium affect root growth of maize through interaction with the cell wall - plasma membrane - cytoskeleton continuum? [J].
Horst, WJ ;
Schmohl, N ;
Kollmeier, M ;
Baluska, F ;
Sivaguru, M .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1999, 215 (02) :163-174