The incidental indeterminate adrenal mass on CT (>10 h) in patients without cancer:: Is further Imaging necessary?: Follow-up of 321 consecutive indeterminate adrenal masses

被引:44
作者
Song, Julie H. [1 ]
Chaudhry, Fakhra S. [1 ]
Mayo-Smith, William W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Rhode Isl Hosp, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Providence, RI 02903 USA
关键词
adenoma; adrenal glands; adrenal mass; benign adenoma; CT; incidental adrenal mass; incidentalomas; neoplasms;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.07.2167
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine whether follow-up imaging evaluation is necessary for incidentally discovered indeterminate adrenal lesions (> 10 H) on CT in patients with no known malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A computer search of CT reports from January 2000 to December 2003 identified patients with incidentally detected, indeterminate, but benign-appearing adrenal lesions who had no known malignancy and no clinical suspicion of hyperfunctioning adrenal mass. Patients with adrenal masses diagnostic on the initial CT or heterogeneous masses were excluded. Two hundred ninety patients with 321 lesions met the study criteria. Each lesion was determined to be benign or malignant based on histopathology, characterization with diagnostic imaging studies, or a minimum of 1 year of stability on imaging follow-up or 2 years of stability on clinical follow-up. RESULTS. Of the 321 lesions, 318 masses (99.1%) were confirmed to be benign and clinically insignificant. These included three (0.9%) histologically confirmed adenomas, 198 (61.7%) adenomas by imaging characterization, five (1.6%) other benign lesions, 71 (22.1%) masses stable on imaging follow-up, and 41 (12.8%) masses with clinical stability. There were three (0.9%) clinically unsuspected functioning masses: one cortisol-producing adenoma and two pheochromocytomas. There were no metastatic adrenal lesions, even among the 13 patients who subsequently developed malignancy elsewhere. CONCLUSION. All of the incidentally detected adrenal masses with a CT attenuation of > 10 H were benign in patients with no known malignancy. Follow-up imaging to characterize an incidental adrenal mass appears to have a limited role in this patient cohort.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1123
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Adrenal masses: CT characterization with histogram analysis method [J].
Bae, KT ;
Fuangtharnthip, P ;
Prasad, SR ;
Joe, BN ;
Heiken, JP .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (03) :735-742
[2]   Prevalence and natural history of adrenal incidentalomas [J].
Barzon, L ;
Sonino, N ;
Fallo, F ;
Palù, G ;
Boscaro, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2003, 149 (04) :273-285
[3]   Long-term morphological and hormonal follow-up in a single unit on 115 patients with adrenal incidentalomas [J].
Bernini, GP ;
Moretti, A ;
Oriandini, C ;
Bardini, M ;
Taurino, C ;
Salvetti, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 92 (06) :1104-1109
[4]   Distinguishing benign from malignant adrenal masses: Multi-detector row CT protocol with 10-minute delay [J].
Blake, MA ;
Kalra, MK ;
Sweeney, AT ;
Lucey, BC ;
Maher, MM ;
Sahani, DV ;
Halpern, EF ;
Mueller, PR ;
Hahn, PF ;
Boland, GW .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (02) :578-585
[5]   Characterization of adrenal masses using unenhanced CT: An analysis of the CT literature [J].
Boland, GWL ;
Lee, MJ ;
Gazelle, GS ;
Halpern, EF ;
McNicholas, MMJ ;
Mueller, PR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (01) :201-204
[6]   Adrenal incidentaloma -: experience of a standardized diagnostic programme in the Swedish prospective study [J].
Bülow, B ;
Ahrén, B .
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 252 (03) :239-246
[7]   Adrenal masses: Characterization with combined unenhanced and delayed enhanced CT [J].
Caoili, EM ;
Korobkin, M ;
Francis, IR ;
Cohan, RH ;
Platt, JF ;
Dunnick, NR ;
Raghupathi, KI .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 222 (03) :629-633
[8]  
Choyke Peter L, 2006, J Am Coll Radiol, V3, P498
[9]  
Copeland PM, 2007, JCOM, V14, P49
[10]   Review - Imaging of adrenal incidentalomas: Current status [J].
Dunnick, NR ;
Korobkin, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (03) :559-568