An Approach to Solve Group-Decision-Making Problems With Ordinal Interval Numbers

被引:58
作者
Fan, Zhi-Ping [1 ]
Liu, Yang [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Sch Business Adm, Shenyang 110004, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS | 2010年 / 40卷 / 05期
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Alternative ranking; decision analysis; group decision making (GDM); ordinal interval numbers; possibility degree; FUZZY PREFERENCE RELATIONS; GOAL PROGRAMMING APPROACH; COMPARISON MATRICES; AGGREGATION; RANKING; MODELS; INFORMATION; ENVIRONMENT; OPERATORS; WEIGHTS;
D O I
10.1109/TSMCB.2009.2039477
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The ordinal interval number is a form of uncertain preference information in group decision making (GDM), while it is seldom discussed in the existing research. This paper investigates how the ranking order of alternatives is determined based on preference information of ordinal interval numbers in GDM problems. When ranking a large quantity of ordinal interval numbers, the efficiency and accuracy of the ranking process are critical. A new approach is proposed to rank alternatives using ordinal interval numbers when every ranking ordinal in an ordinal interval number is thought to be uniformly and independently distributed in its interval. First, we give the definition of possibility degree on comparing two ordinal interval numbers and the related theory analysis. Then, to rank alternatives, by comparing multiple ordinal interval numbers, a collective expectation possibility degree matrix on pairwise comparisons of alternatives is built, and an optimization model based on this matrix is constructed. Furthermore, an algorithm is also presented to rank alternatives by solving the model. Finally, two examples are used to illustrate the use of the proposed approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1413 / 1423
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   ORDINAL RANKING AND INTENSITY OF PREFERENCE - A LINEAR-PROGRAMMING APPROACH [J].
ALI, I ;
COOK, WD ;
KRESS, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1986, 32 (12) :1642-1647
[2]   PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications [J].
Behzadian, Majid ;
Kazemadeh, R. B. ;
Albadvi, A. ;
Aghdasi, M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 200 (01) :198-215
[3]  
BORDA JC, 1989, MEMOIRE ELECTIONS SC
[4]   Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment [J].
Chen, CT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) :1-9
[5]   A note on the reciprocity in the aggregation of fuzzy preference relations using OWA operators [J].
Chiclana, F ;
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E ;
Martínez, L .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2003, 137 (01) :71-83
[6]   Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations [J].
Chiclana, F ;
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1998, 97 (01) :33-48
[7]   Distance-based and ad hoc consensus models in ordinal preference ranking [J].
Cook, WD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 172 (02) :369-385
[8]  
Facchinetti G, 1998, INT J INTELL SYST, V13, P613, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-111X(199807)13:7<613::AID-INT2>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-N
[10]   A goal programming approach to group decision making based on multiplicative preference relations and fuzzy preference relations [J].
Fan, Zhi-Ping ;
Ma, Jian ;
Jiang, Yan-Ping ;
Sun, Yong-Hong ;
Ma, Louis .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 174 (01) :311-321