Differential beliefs, perceived social influences, and self-efficacy expectations among smokers in various motivational phases

被引:109
作者
De Vries, H [1 ]
Mudde, AN [1 ]
Dijkstra, A [1 ]
Willemsen, MC [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Hlth Educ & Promot, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
beliefs; social influences; self-efficacy; Transtheoretical model; smoking;
D O I
10.1006/pmed.1998.0344
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. The ASE model, an integration of social psychological models, states that motivational phases and the transition from one phase to another can be predicted by behavioral determinants, The goal of the present study was to replicate the so-called o pattern that was found in earlier Dutch studies, Methods. In four cross-sectional studies (N = 918, N = 354, N = 225, N = 317), smokers filled in a questionnaire based on the ASE model, while the motivational phase question was based on the stage definitions from the Transtheoretical model. Results, Precontemplating smokers perceived fewer advantages of quitting than contemplators. Precontemplators encountered less support for quitting than contemplators, Contemplators reported lower self-efficacy expectations than those in preparation, while this group had lower self-efficacy expectations than respondents in action. Ex-smokers in maintenance reported fewer disadvantages of quitting than those in action. Conclusions. Since changes in cognitive determinants are thought to mediate transitions in motivational phases, the results can be used to tailor health education messages to the needs of smokers in the various motivational phases. The results suggest that smokers in precontemplation would benefit most from information about the pros of quitting and from obtaining support for quitting. Smokers in contemplation and preparation may benefit most from self-efficacy-enhancing information. (C) 1998 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 689
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1962, DIFFUSION INNOVATION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1985, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, SELF EFFICACY
[5]   SELF-EFFICACY AND SMOKING REEXAMINED - CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY AND CLINICAL UTILITY [J].
BAER, JS ;
HOLT, CS ;
LICHTENSTEIN, E .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 54 (06) :846-852
[6]  
BANDURA A, 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
[7]   SELF-EFFICACY AND RELAPSE IN SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAMS [J].
CONDIOTTE, MM ;
LICHTENSTEIN, E .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 49 (05) :648-658
[8]  
CUMMINGS KM, 1988, J BEHAV MED, V11, P267
[9]   Predicting stage transitions for smoking cessation applying the attitude social influence efficacy model [J].
De Vries, H ;
Mudde, AN .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 1998, 13 (02) :369-385
[10]  
de Vries H., 1988, HEALTH EDUC RES, P273, DOI [10.1093/her/3.3.273, DOI 10.1093/HER/3.3.273]