Echolocation signals of free-ranging killer whales (Orcinus orca) and modeling of foraging for chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)

被引:106
作者
Au, WWL [1 ]
Ford, JKB
Horne, JK
Allman, KAN
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii, Hawaii Inst Marine Biol, Marine Mammal Res Program, Kaneohe, HI 96744 USA
[2] Marine Mammal Ctr, Sausalito, CA 94965 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Aquat & Fisheries Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Pacific Biol Stn, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6N7, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.1642628
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Fish-eating "resident"-type killer whales (Orcinus orca) that frequent the coastal waters off northeastern Vancouver Island, Canada have a strong preference for chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). The whales in this region often forage along steep cliffs that extend into the water, echolocating their prey. Echolocation signals of resident killer whales were measured with a four-hydrophone symmetrical star array and the signals were simultaneously digitized at a sample rate of 500 kHz using a lunch-box PC. A portable VCR recorded the images from an underwater camera located adjacent to the array center. Only signals emanating from close to the beam axis (1185 total) were chosen for a detailed analysis. Killer whales project very broadband echolocation signals (Q equal 0.9 to 1.4) that tend to have bimodal frequency structure. Ninety-seven percent of the signals had center frequencies between 45 and 90 kHz with bandwidths between 35 and 50 kHz. The peak-to-peak source level of the echolocation signals decreased as a function of the one-way transmission loss to the array. Source levels varied between 195 and 224 dB re: 1 muPa. Using a model of target strength for chinook salmon, the echo levels from the echolocation signals are estimated for different horizontal ranges between a whale and a salmon. At a horizontal range of 100 m, the echo level should exceed an Orcinus hearing threshold at 50 kHz by over 29 dB and should be greater than sea state 4 noise by at least 9 dB. In moderately heavy rain conditions, the detection range will be reduced substantially and the echo level at a horizontal range of 40 m would be close to the level of the rain noise. (C) 2004 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 909
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   MEASUREMENT OF ECHOLOCATION SIGNALS OF ATLANTIC BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN, TURSIOPS-TRUNCATUS MONTAGU, IN OPEN WATERS [J].
AU, WWL ;
FLOYD, RW ;
PENNER, RH ;
MURCHISON, AE .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1974, 56 (04) :1280-1290
[2]   Echolocation signals of wild Atlantic spotted dolphin (Stenella frontalis) [J].
Au, WWL ;
Herzing, DL .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 113 (01) :598-604
[3]   Atlantic bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) hearing threshold for brief broadband signals [J].
Au, WWL ;
Lemonds, DW ;
Vlachos, S ;
Nachtigall, PE ;
Roitblat, HL .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 116 (02) :151-157
[4]   RECEIVING BEAM PATTERNS AND DIRECTIVITY INDEXES OF THE ATLANTIC BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN TURSIOPS-TRUNCATUS [J].
AU, WWL ;
MOORE, PWB .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1984, 75 (01) :255-262
[5]   ECHOLOCATION SIGNALS AND TRANSMISSION BEAM PATTERN OF A FALSE KILLER WHALE (PSEUDORCA CRASSIDENS) [J].
AU, WWL ;
PAWLOSKI, JL ;
NACHTIGALL, PE ;
BLONZ, M ;
GISNER, RC .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1995, 98 (01) :51-59
[6]   Transmission beam pattern and echolocation signals of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) [J].
Au, WWL ;
Kastelein, RA ;
Rippe, T ;
Schooneman, NM .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 106 (06) :3699-3705
[7]  
Au WWL, 1993, SONAR DOLPHINS
[8]  
AUBAUER R, 1995, THESIS TH DARMSTADT
[9]   The mixed blessing of echolocation: Differences in sonar use by fish-eating and mammal-eating killer whales [J].
BarrettLennard, LG ;
Ford, JKB ;
Heise, KA .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1996, 51 :553-565
[10]   Acoustic backscattering by Hawaiian lutjanid snappers. I. Target strength and swimbladder characteristics [J].
Benoit-Bird, KJ ;
Au, WWL ;
Kelley, CD .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 114 (05) :2757-2766