Economic benefits of biodiversity exceed costs of conservation at an African rainforest reserve

被引:97
作者
Naidoo, R
Adamowicz, WL
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Biol Sci, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Rural Econ, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
关键词
choice experiment; cost-benefit; deforestation; land value; Uganda;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0508036102
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Economic research on biodiversity conservation has focused on the costs of conservation reserves and the benefits of intact ecosystems; however, no study has simultaneously considered the costs and benefits of species diversity, a fundamental component of biodiversity. We quantified the costs and benefits of avian biodiversity at a rainforest reserve in Uganda through a combination of economic surveys of tourists, spatial land-use analyses, and species-area relationships. Our results show that revising entrance fees and redistributing ecotourism revenues would protect 114 of 143 forest bird species (80%) under current market conditions. This total would increase to 131 species (approximate to 90%) if entrance fees were optimized to capture the tourist's willingness to pay for forest visits and the chance of seeing increased numbers of bird species. In contrast, the cost of purchasing agricultural land for ecological rehabilitation of the avian habitat would be economically prohibitive. These results suggest that local biodiversity markets could play a positive role in tropical conservation strategies if the appropriate institutions for redistribution can be developed.
引用
收藏
页码:16712 / 16716
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation [J].
Ando, A ;
Camm, J ;
Polasky, S ;
Solow, A .
SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5359) :2126-2128
[2]   Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs [J].
Balmford, A ;
Gaston, KJ ;
Blyth, S ;
James, A ;
Kapos, V .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (03) :1046-1050
[3]   Ecology - Economic reasons for conserving wild nature [J].
Balmford, A ;
Bruner, A ;
Cooper, P ;
Costanza, R ;
Farber, S ;
Green, RE ;
Jenkins, M ;
Jefferiss, P ;
Jessamy, V ;
Madden, J ;
Munro, K ;
Myers, N ;
Naeem, S ;
Paavola, J ;
Rayment, M ;
Rosendo, S ;
Roughgarden, J ;
Trumper, K ;
Turner, RK .
SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5583) :950-953
[4]  
Barnes JI, 1999, S AFR J WILDL RES, V29, P101
[5]   The domestic benefits of tropical forests: A critical review [J].
Chomitz, KM ;
Kumari, K .
WORLD BANK RESEARCH OBSERVER, 1998, 13 (01) :13-35
[6]   Roads, land use, and deforestation: A spatial model applied to belize [J].
Chomitz, KM ;
Gray, DA .
WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1996, 10 (03) :487-512
[7]   Island-hopping invaders hitch a ride with tourists in South Georgia [J].
Chown, SL ;
Gaston, KJ .
NATURE, 2000, 408 (6813) :637-637
[8]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260
[9]   Seeking the great transition [J].
Daily, GC ;
Walker, BH .
NATURE, 2000, 403 (6767) :243-245
[10]   Determinants of deforestation and the economics of protection: An application to Mexico [J].
Deininger, K ;
Minten, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 84 (04) :943-960