A REVIEW OF STATISTICAL METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF CORRELATED PREDICTORS AND IDENTIFICATION OF DRIVERS OF CONSUMER LIKING

被引:92
作者
Bi, Jian [1 ]
机构
[1] Sensometr Res & Serv, Richmond, VA 23236 USA
关键词
VARIABLE IMPORTANCE; MULTIPLE-REGRESSION; LINEAR-REGRESSION; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; RANDOM FOREST; STRUCTURE COEFFICIENTS; DOMINANCE ANALYSIS; PREFERENCE; CLASSIFICATION; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-459X.2012.00370.x
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
This article attempts to deliver the following message to the researchers and practitioners in the sensory field. (1) Theoretically, drivers of consumer liking is based on relative importance of explanatory variables in a linear model. The problem is complicated when the variables involve linear dependence, which is the common situation in sensory and consumer data. (2) The commonly used methodologies, e.g., conjoint analysis, preference mapping and Kano's model, have serious limitations for determination of relative importance of correlated attributes and identification of drivers of consumer liking. (3) The conventional statistics, e.g., correlation coefficient, standard regression coefficient and P values of tests for regression parameters, etc., are inadequate and invalid measures of relative importance of correlated attributes. (4) There are three state-of-the-art methods for determination of relative importance of correlated attributes. They are the Lindeman, Merenda and Gold's method, Breiman's Random Forest and Johnson's relative weight. This article also provides statistical background and almost exhaustive main references on the topic of relative importance of variables scattered in various academic journals in different fields. The information will help the sensometricians and researchers with more statistical knowledge to embrace the mainstream of the research on the topic and to pursue advanced methods for drivers of consumer liking.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 101
页数:15
相关论文
共 116 条
  • [1] Achen C., 1982, Interpreting and Using Regression
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, Statistics for Sensory and Consumer Science
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1997, Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction
  • [4] PROBLEMS IN NONORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
    APPELBAUM, MI
    CRAMER, EM
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1974, 81 (06) : 335 - 343
  • [5] Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures
    Archer, Kelfie J.
    Kirnes, Ryan V.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2008, 52 (04) : 2249 - 2260
  • [6] The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression
    Azen, R
    Budescu, DV
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 8 (02) : 129 - 148
  • [7] Criticality of predictors in multiple regression
    Azen, R
    Budescu, DV
    Reiser, B
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 54 : 201 - 225
  • [8] Azen R., 2003, Dominance analysis SAS macros
  • [9] Forecasting dangerous inmate misconduct: An application of ensemble statistical procedures
    Berk, Richard A.
    Kriegler, Brian
    Baek, Jong-Ho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2006, 22 (02) : 131 - 145
  • [10] Berk RA, 2008, SPRINGER SER STAT, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-77501-2_1