Comparison of open and laparoscopic treatment of acute appendicitis

被引:57
作者
Kurtz, RJ [1 ]
Heimann, TM [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
appendicitis; appendectomy; laparoscopy; surgery;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00694-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Appendectomy can be performed using either a laparoscopic or an open technique. This study compares the outcome of patients treated for acute appendicitis by open appendectomy with the outcome of those undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods: Patients undergoing appendectomy at The Mount Sinai Hospital between 1994 and 1998 were studied. Outcome of patients having open appendectomy was compared with that of patients having laparoscopic appendectomy. Results: Seven hundred fifty-eight patients underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis during the 5-year study period. Two hundred seventy-one (36%) had open appendectomy and 487 (64%) had laparoscopic appendectomy. Patients subsequently found to have a normal appendix had the highest rate of laparoscopic appendectomy, whereas those with gangrenous appendicitis were most likely to have open appendectomy (P <0.05). There was a significant decline in the postoperative length of stay for open cases during the length of the study. In the final year, the difference in length of stay between open and laparoscopic appendectomy was only 1 day. Patients with gangrenous appendicitis had a significantly longer length of stay than did patients with a normal appendix or suppurative appendicitis. The hospital cost of laparoscopic appendectomy was greater than that for open appendectomy but the extra expenditure in the operating room was offset by the longer length of stay of the patients having open surgery. Conclusions: Differences in outcome between open and laparoscopic appendectomy are minor. In this study, more difficult cases with gangrenous appendicitis were more likely to require open appendectomy whereas milder forms of appendicitis, especially in women, were more likely to be treated by laparoscopy. Savings from the slightly shorter hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy are offset by the higher surgical cost of the laparoscopic equipment. (C) 2001 Excerpta Medica, Inc. Ali rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 214
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy [J].
Chung, RS ;
Rowland, DY ;
Li, P ;
Diaz, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (03) :250-256
[2]   A prospective trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patient [J].
Horton, MD ;
Counter, SF ;
Florence, MG ;
Hart, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (05) :379-381
[3]   A state wide evaluation of appendectomy in children [J].
Kokoska, ER ;
Murayama, KM ;
Silen, ML ;
Miller, TA ;
Dillon, PA ;
Weber, TR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 178 (06) :537-540
[4]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy [J].
Merhoff, AM ;
Merhoff, GC ;
Franklin, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (05) :375-378
[5]   Appendectomy in the pre- and postlaparoscopic eras [J].
Nguyen, DB ;
Silen, W ;
Hodin, RA .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 1999, 3 (01) :67-73
[6]  
Nie N., 1968, STAT PACKAGE SOCIAL
[7]   Ultrasonography and limited computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis in children [J].
Peña, BMG ;
Mandl, KD ;
Kraus, SJ ;
Fischer, AC ;
Fleisher, GR ;
Lund, DP ;
Taylor, GA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (11) :1041-1046
[8]  
VALINA VL, 1993, ANN SURG, V218, P685