Definition of a standard-risk group in children with AML

被引:110
作者
Creutzig, U
Zimmerman, M
Ritter, J
Henze, G
Graf, N
Löffler, H
Schellong, G
机构
[1] Univ Childrens Hosp, Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Childrens Hosp, Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Childrens Hosp, Homburg, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med 2, Kiel, Germany
关键词
risk groups; childhood AML; FAB types; cytogenetics; therapy response;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01304.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To define paediatric AML patients with a favourable outcome in order to design a risk-adapted therapy we analysed 489 children under 17 years of age treated similarly in studies AMT,BFM 83 and 87. 369 patients (75.4%) achieved remission. Estimated probabilities of survival, event-free survival (EFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years were 50% (SE 2%), 43% (SE 2%) and 58% (SE 3%), respectively Multivariate analysis revealed bone marrow blasts on day 15, morphologically defined risk groups and hyperleucocytosis to be of prognostic value. EFS at 5 years estimated for patients with less than or equal to 5% and >5% blasts on day 15 were 56% (SE 3%) v 27% (SE 4%); for the favourable morphological subgroups (M1/M2 with Auer rods, M3 and (M4eo) it was 60%; (SE 4%) compared with other patients (33%, SE 3%), P (Kaplan-Meier) = 0.0001 each. Hyperleucocytosis proved tu be an independent prognostic factor, indicating a high risk, especially for early failure. The specific Karyotypes t(8;21), t(15;17) and inv16 were closely related to the favourable morphology and outcome was in the same range. We conclude that for the definition of a standard-risk group a combination of morphological and response criteria may be sufficient. The standard-risk group defined by favourable morphology and a blast cell reduction on day 15 (not required for M3) comprises 31% of all patients, P survival, pEFS and pDFS at 5 years were 73% (SE 4%), 68% (SE 5%) and 76% (SE 4%), respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:630 / 639
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
ABLIN AR, 1984, AM J PEDIAT HEMATOL, V6, P287
[2]  
Appelbaum FR, 1997, SEMIN ONCOL, V24, P114
[3]  
BALL ED, 1991, BLOOD, V77, P2242
[4]   CRITERIA FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE-LEUKEMIA OF MEGAKARYOCYTE LINEAGE (M7) - A REPORT OF THE FRENCH-AMERICAN-BRITISH COOPERATIVE GROUP [J].
BENNETT, JM ;
CATOVSKY, D ;
DANIEL, MT ;
FLANDRIN, G ;
GALTON, DAG ;
GRALNICK, HR ;
SULTAN, C .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1985, 103 (03) :460-462
[5]   PROPOSAL FOR THE RECOGNITION OF MINIMALLY DIFFERENTIATED ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA (AML-MO) [J].
BENNETT, JM ;
CATOVSKY, D ;
DANIEL, MT ;
FLANDRIN, G ;
GALTON, DAG ;
GRALNICK, HR ;
SULTAN, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1991, 78 (03) :325-329
[6]   PROPOSED REVISED CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA - A REPORT OF THE FRENCH-AMERICAN-BRITISH COOPERATIVE GROUP [J].
BENNETT, JM ;
CATOVSKY, D ;
DANIEL, MT ;
FLANDRIN, G ;
GALTON, DAG ;
GRALNICK, HR ;
SULTAN, C .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1985, 103 (04) :620-625
[7]  
Buchner T, 1996, LEUKEMIA, V10, pS28
[8]   MINIMALLY DIFFERENTIATED ACUTE-LEUKEMIA [J].
CADWELL, FJ ;
BURNS, CP ;
DICK, FR ;
JONES, MP ;
HECKMAN, KD ;
WEINER, GJ ;
GOEKEN, JA .
LEUKEMIA RESEARCH, 1993, 17 (03) :199-208
[9]   REPORT OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE-SPONSORED WORKSHOP ON DEFINITIONS OF DIAGNOSIS AND RESPONSE IN ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA [J].
CHESON, BD ;
CASSILETH, PA ;
HEAD, DR ;
SCHIFFER, CA ;
BENNETT, JM ;
BLOOMFIELD, CD ;
BRUNNING, R ;
GALE, RP ;
GREVER, MR ;
KEATING, MJ ;
SAWITSKY, A ;
STASS, S ;
WEINSTEIN, H ;
WOODS, WG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (05) :813-819
[10]  
CLIMENT JAM, 1997, LEUKEMIA, V11, P1999