One-dimensional molecular representations and similarity calculations: Methodology and validation

被引:85
作者
Dixon, SL [1 ]
Merz, KM [1 ]
机构
[1] Accelrys, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/jm010137f
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Drug discovery research is increasingly dedicated to biological screening on a massive scale, which seems to imply a basic rejection of many computer-assisted techniques originally designed to add rationality to the early stages of discovery. While ever-faster and more clever 3D methodologies continue to be developed and rejected as alternatives to indiscriminant screening, simpler tools based on 2D structure have carved a stable niche in the high-throughput paradigm of drug discovery. Their staying power is due in no small part to simplicity, ease of use, and demonstrated ability to explain structure-activity data. This observation led us to wonder whether an even simpler view of structure might offer an advantage over existing 2D and 3D methods. Accordingly, we introduce 1D representations of chemical structure, which are generated by collapsing a 3D molecular model or a 2D chemical graph onto a single coordinate of atomic positions. Atoms along this coordinate are differentiated according to elemental type, hybridization, and connectivity. By aligning 1D representations to match up identical atom types, a measure of overall structural similarity is afforded. In extensive structure-activity validation tests, 1D similarities consistently outperform both Daylight 2D fingerprints and Cerius(2) pharmacophore fingerprints, suggesting that this new, simple means of representing and comparing structures may offer a significant advantage over existing tried-and-true methods.
引用
收藏
页码:3795 / 3809
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Can we learn to distinguish between "drug-like" and "nondrug-like" molecules? [J].
Ajay ;
Walters, WP ;
Murcko, MA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 41 (18) :3314-3324
[2]  
Borg I., 1997, MODERN MULTIDIMENSIO
[3]   Use of structure Activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection [J].
Brown, RD ;
Martin, YC .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1996, 36 (03) :572-584
[4]   HOW SIMILAR IS A MOLECULE TO ANOTHER - AN ELECTRON-DENSITY MEASURE OF SIMILARITY BETWEEN 2 MOLECULAR-STRUCTURES [J].
CARBO, R ;
LEYDA, L ;
ARNAU, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY, 1980, 17 (06) :1185-1189
[5]   PHARMACOPHORIC PATTERN-MATCHING IN PILES OF 3-DIMENSIONAL CHEMICAL STRUCTURES - COMPARISON OF CONFORMATIONAL-SEARCHING ALGORITHMS FOR FLEXIBLE SEARCHING [J].
CLARK, DE ;
JONES, G ;
WILLETT, P ;
KENNY, PW ;
GLEN, RC .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1994, 34 (01) :197-206
[6]  
Cooper L, 1981, INTRO DYNAMIC PROGRA
[7]   Bioisosterism as a molecular diversity descriptor: Steric fields of single ''topomeric'' conformers [J].
Cramer, RD ;
Clark, RD ;
Patterson, DE ;
Ferguson, AM .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 39 (16) :3060-3069
[8]   COMPARATIVE MOLECULAR-FIELD ANALYSIS (COMFA) .1. EFFECT OF SHAPE ON BINDING OF STEROIDS TO CARRIER PROTEINS [J].
CRAMER, RD ;
PATTERSON, DE ;
BUNCE, JD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1988, 110 (18) :5959-5967
[9]   Investigation of classification methods for the prediction of activity in diverse chemical libraries [J].
Dixon, SL ;
Villar, HO .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 1999, 13 (05) :533-545
[10]  
Fletcher R., 1980, Practical Methods of Optimization