A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures

被引:203
作者
Talamini, MA
Chapman, S
Horgan, S
Melvin, WS
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] E Carolina Univ, Dept Surg, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Surg, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2003年 / 17卷 / 10期
关键词
robotics; surgery; outcomes; robotic-assisted procedures; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-002-8853-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Academic Robotics Group prospectively studied 211 robotically assisted operations to assess the safety and utility of robotically assisted surgery. Methods: All operations took place at one of four member institutions between June 2000 and June 2001 using the recently FDA-approved daVinci robotic system. A variety of procedures were undertaken, including antireflux surgery (69), cholecystectomy (36), Heller myotomy (26), bowel resection (17), donor nephrectomy (15), left internal mammery artery mobilization (14), gastric bypass (seven), splenectomy (seven), adrenalectomy (six), exploratory laparoscopy (three), pyloroplasty (four), gastrojejunostomy (two), distal pancreatectomy (one), duodenal polypectomy (one), esophagectomy (one), gastric mass resection (one), and lysis of adhesions (one). Results: Average operating room time was 188 min (range 45 to 387, SD = 83), surgical time 143 min (range 35 to 462, SD = 63), and robot time 90 min (range 12 to 235, SD = 47). Median length of stay was I day (range 0 to 37). There were 8 (4%) technical complications during procedures, five minor (four hook cautery dislodgement, one slipped robotic trocar) and three major (system malfunctions, two of which required conversion to standard laparoscopy). In all cases, technical problems caused only delay, without apparent altered outcome. There were medical/surgical complications in nine patients (4%). Six (3%) were considered major, including one death unrelated to the robotic procedure. Conclusions: The results of robotic-assisted surgery compare favorably with those of conventional laparoscopy with respect to mortality, complications, and length of stay. Robotic-assisted surgery is safe and effective and is a new reality for American surgery. The role of these devices in surgery will expand as the technology evolves.
引用
收藏
页码:1521 / 1524
页数:4
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Cadière GB, 2001, WORLD J SURG, V25, P1467
[2]   Virtual reality, robotics, and other wizardry in 21st century trauma care [J].
Maniscalco-Theberge, ME ;
Elliott, DC .
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 79 (06) :1241-+
[3]   Telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy:: Initial clinical experience with 25 patients [J].
Marescaux, J ;
Smith, MK ;
Fölscher, D ;
Jamali, F ;
Malassagne, B ;
Leroy, J .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 234 (01) :1-7
[4]  
MELVIN WS, 2002, J GI SURG, V6, P32
[5]   Preparing surgeons for the 21st century -: Implications of advanced technologies [J].
Satava, RM ;
Jones, SB .
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 80 (04) :1353-+
[6]   Robotic laparoscopic surgery:: A comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus Systems [J].
Sung, GT ;
Gill, IS .
UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (06) :893-898
[7]  
Taylor R H, 1999, Med Image Anal, V3, P301, DOI 10.1016/S1361-8415(99)80026-7