An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective

被引:565
作者
Spanos, YE
Lioukas, S
机构
[1] Athens Univ Econ & Business, Athens 10434, Greece
[2] Org Econ Cooperat & Dev, Paris, France
关键词
competitive strategy; resource based view; industry forces; sustainable competitive advantage; path analysis;
D O I
10.1002/smj.174
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this study we revisit some fundamental questions that are increasingly at the heart of current strategic management discourse regarding the relative impact of industry and firm-specific factors on sustainable competitive advantage. We explore this issue by referring to respective assertions of two major perspectives that dominate the literature over the last two decades: the Porter framework of competitive strategy and the more recent resource-based view of the firm. A composite model is proposed which elaborates upon both perspectives' divergent causal logic with respect to the conditions relevant for firm success. Empirical findings suggest that industry and firm specific effects are both important but explain different dimensions of performance. Where industry forces influence market performance and profitability, firm assets act upon accomplishments in the market arena (i.e., market performance), and via the latter, to profitability. The paper concludes with directions for future research that will seek to integrate both content and process aspects of firm behavior. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:907 / 934
页数:28
相关论文
共 119 条
  • [1] ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINANTS OF DECISION-MAKING UNCERTAINTY IN MARKETING CHANNELS
    ACHROL, RS
    STERN, LW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1988, 25 (01) : 36 - 50
  • [2] Aldrich H., 1979, ORG ENV
  • [3] STRATEGIC ASSETS AND ORGANIZATIONAL RENT
    AMIT, R
    SCHOEMAKER, PJH
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1993, 14 (01) : 33 - 46
  • [4] Andrews K.R., 1971, The concept of corporate strategy
  • [5] [Anonymous], RESOURCES FIRMS STRA
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1972, AM IND STRUCTURE CON
  • [7] [Anonymous], ACAD MANAGEMENT P
  • [8] Ansoff H.I., 1965, CORPORATE STRATEGY
  • [9] ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS
    ARMSTRONG, JS
    OVERTON, TS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) : 396 - 402
  • [10] Bain J., 1968, IND ORG, V2n