Oral midazolam premedication for day case breast surgery, a randomised prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study

被引:20
作者
Abdul-Latif, MS
Putland, AJ
McCluskey, A [1 ]
Meadows, DP
Remington, SAM
机构
[1] Stepping Hill Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Stockport SK2 7JE, Lancs, England
[2] Royal Bolton Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Bolton BL4 0JR, England
关键词
anaesthesia : day case; premedication : oral midazolam;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01974-2.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We conducted a randomised prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of oral midazolam premedication in 50 ASA I and II female patients scheduled to undergo day case breast surgery. Anxiety was assessed using 100-mm visual analogue scales (VAS) and The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) psychometric questionnaire. Midazolam premedication did not significantly reduce either VAS or STAI score, although heart rate and systolic arterial pressure immediately before induction of anaesthesia were significantly lower in patients who received midazolam (p=0.006 and 0.039, respectively). Induction of anaesthesia, was achieved with a lower dose of propofol (p=0.0009) and excellent (Grade I) conditions for insertion of a laryngeal mask airway were achieved more often after midazolam premedication (p=0.038). Arterial desaturation during induction of anaesthesia and insertion of a laryngeal mask airway occurred more often in patients who received placebo (p=0.022). There was a good correlation between VAS and STAI used to assess the anxiolytic effects of premedication. (Spearman coefficient 0.58, p<0.0001).
引用
收藏
页码:990 / 994
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Ahmed Nauman, 1995, JPMA (Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association), V45, P239
[2]   Midazolam premedication delays recovery after propofol without modifying involuntary movements [J].
Bevan, JC ;
Veall, GRO ;
Macnab, AJ ;
Ries, CR ;
Marsland, C .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 85 (01) :50-54
[3]   Dose-dependent effects of oral premedication with midazolam. [J].
Biro, P ;
Weidmann, G ;
Pietzsch, S ;
Alon, E ;
Brugger, P .
ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 1997, 32 (11) :672-677
[4]  
DESAINTONGE DMC, 1982, BRIT J CLIN PHARMACO, V13, P775
[5]   PLACEBO CONTROLLED COMPARISON OF MIDAZOLAM, TRIAZOLAM AND DIAZEPAM AS ORAL PREMEDICANTS FOR OUTPATIENT ANESTHESIA [J].
FORREST, P ;
GALLETLY, DC ;
YEE, P .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1987, 15 (03) :296-304
[6]   Parental presence plus oral midazolam decreases frequency of 5% halothane inductions in children [J].
Gillerman, RG ;
Hinkle, AJ ;
Green, HM ;
Cornell, L ;
Dodge, CP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1996, 8 (06) :480-485
[8]   PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOAVAILABILITY OF MIDAZOLAM IN MAN [J].
HEIZMANN, P ;
ECKERT, M ;
ZIEGLER, WH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1983, 16 :S43-S49
[9]   COMPARATIVE PHARMACOKINETICS OF MIDAZOLAM AND LOPRAZOLAM IN HEALTHY-SUBJECTS AFTER ORAL-ADMINISTRATION [J].
JOCHEMSEN, R ;
VANRIJN, PA ;
HAZELZET, TGM ;
VANBOXTEL, CJ ;
BREIMER, DD .
BIOPHARMACEUTICS & DRUG DISPOSITION, 1986, 7 (01) :53-61
[10]   Parental presence during induction of anesthesia versus sedative premedication - Which intervention is more effective? [J].
Kain, ZN ;
Mayes, LC ;
Wang, SM ;
Caramico, LA ;
Hofstadter, MB .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (05) :1147-1156