The inclination distribution of the Kuiper belt

被引:236
作者
Brown, ME [1 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Div Geol & Planetary Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
关键词
Kuiper belt; solar system : formation;
D O I
10.1086/320391
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We develop a general method for determining the unbiased inclination distribution of the Kuiper belt using only the inclination and latitude of discovery of known Kuiper belt objects (KBOs). These two parameters are well determined for each discovered object, so we can use all 379 known KBOs (as of 2001 January 1)-without knowing the object's precise orbit, area, detection efficiency, or the latitudinal coverage of the survey that found the object-to determine the inclination distribution. We find that a natural analytic form for the inclination distribution is a sine of the inclination multiplied by a Gaussian. The inclination distribution of all KBOs is well fitted by sin i multiplied by a sum of two Gaussians with widths 2.degrees6-(+.8)(-2) and 15 degrees +/- 1 degrees. for this inclination distribution, the Kuiper belt has an effective area of 8100(-1100)(+1500) deg(2) and a FWHM of 12.5 degrees +/- 3.5 degrees in latitude The inclination distribution of the different dynamical classes appear different. The Plutinos are well fit by sin i multiplied by a single Gaussian of width 10.degrees2(-1.8)(+2.5), the classical KBOs cannot abe fit to a single Gaussian but are well fit by sin i multiplied by the sum of two Gaussians of widths 2.degrees2-(+.2)(.6) and 17 degrees+/-3 degrees, and the scattered KBOs are poorly fit by sin i multiplied by a single Gaussian of width 20 degrees+/-4 degrees. The poor fit of the scattered objects is possibly a result of limitations of the method in dealing with large eccentricities. The effective areas of the Plutinos, classical KBOs, and scattered KBOs are 9300 +/- 1800, 6100 +/- 2100, and 17000 +/- 3000 deg(2), respectively. The FWHMs are 23 degrees+/-5 degrees, 6.degrees8(-3.6)(+2.0), and 44 degrees +/-10 degrees, respectively. In all cases, the inclinations of the Kuiper belt objects appear larger than expected from dynamical simulations of possible perturbations.
引用
收藏
页码:2804 / 2814
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Keck pencil-beam survey for faint Kuiper Belt objects [J].
Chiang, EI ;
Brown, ME .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 118 (03) :1411-1422
[2]   A disk of scattered icy objects and the origin of Jupiter-family comets [J].
Duncan, MJ ;
Levison, HF .
SCIENCE, 1997, 276 (5319) :1670-1672
[3]   The dynamical structure of the Kuiper belt [J].
Duncan, MJ ;
Levison, HF ;
Budd, SM .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 110 (06) :3073-+
[4]   Pencil-beam surveys for faint trans-Neptunian objects [J].
Gladman, B ;
Kavelaars, JJ ;
Nicholson, PD ;
Loredo, TJ ;
Burns, JA .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 116 (04) :2042-2054
[5]   Orbital evolution of planets embedded in a planetesimal disk [J].
Hahn, JM ;
Malhotra, R .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 117 (06) :3041-3053
[6]   Orbital migration of Neptune and orbital distribution of trans-Neptunian objects [J].
Ida, S ;
Bryden, G ;
Lin, DNC ;
Tanaka, H .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 534 (01) :428-445
[7]   The Mauna Kea-Cerro-Tololo (MKCT) Kuiper Belt and Centaur survey [J].
Jewitt, D ;
Luu, J ;
Chen, J .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 112 (03) :1225-&
[8]  
Jewitt D. C., 2000, Protostars and planets 4, P1201
[9]   On the size dependence of the inclination distribution of the main Kuiper belt [J].
Levison, HF ;
Stern, SA .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 121 (03) :1730-1735