Universal screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at hospital admission and nosocomial infection in surgical patients

被引:406
作者
Harbarth, Stephan [1 ]
Fankhauser, Carolina [1 ]
Schrenzel, Jacques [2 ]
Christenson, Jan [3 ]
Gervaz, Pascal [3 ]
Bandiera-Clerc, Catherine [1 ]
Renzi, Gesuele [2 ]
Vernaz, Nathalie [4 ]
Sax, Hugo [1 ]
Pittet, Didier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva Hosp & Med Sch, Infect Control Program, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva Hosp & Med Sch, Microbiol Lab, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Geneva Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Surg, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Univ Geneva Hosp & Med Sch, Hosp Pharm, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2008年 / 299卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.299.10.1149
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Experts and policy makers have repeatedly called for universal screening at hospital admission to reduce nosocomial methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus ( MRSA) infection. Objective To determine the effect of an early MRSA detection strategy on nosocomial MRSA infection rates in surgical patients. Design, Setting, and Patients Prospective, interventional cohort study conducted between July 2004 and May 2006 among 21 754 surgical patients at a Swiss teaching hospital using a crossover design to compare 2 MRSA control strategies ( rapid screening on admission plus standard infection control measures vs standard infection control alone). Twelve surgical wards including different surgical specialties were enrolled according to a prespecified agenda, assigned to either the control or intervention group for a 9- month period, then switched over to the other group for a further 9 months. Interventions During the rapid screening intervention periods, patients admitted to the intervention wards for more than 24 hours were screened before or on admission by rapid, multiplex polymerase chain reaction. For both intervention ( n= 10 844) and control ( n= 10 910) periods, standard infection control measures were used for patients with MRSA in all wards and consisted of contact isolation of MRSA carriers, use of dedicated material ( eg, gown, gloves, mask if indicated), adjustment of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis of MRSA carriers, computerized MRSA alert system, and topical decolonization ( nasal mupirocin ointment and chlorhexidine body washing) for 5 days. Main Outcome Measures Incidence of nosocomial MRSA infection, MRSA surgical site infection, and rates of nosocomial acquisition of MRSA. Results Overall, 10 193 of 10 844 patients ( 94%) were screened during the intervention periods. Screening identified 515 MRSA- positive patients ( 5.1%), including 337 previously unknown MRSA carriers. Median time from screening to notification of test results was 22.5 hours ( interquartile range, 12.2- 28.2 hours). In the intervention periods, 93 patients ( 1.11 per 1000 patient- days) developed nosocomial MRSA infection compared with 76 in the control periods ( 0.91 per 1000 patient- days; adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.85- 1.69; P=. 29). The rate of MRSA surgical site infection and nosocomial MRSA acquisition did not change significantly. Fifty- three of 93 infected patients ( 57%) in the intervention wards were MRSA- free on admission and developed MRSA infection during hospitalization. Conclusion A universal, rapid MRSA admission screening strategy did not reduce nosocomial MRSA infection in a surgical department with endemic MRSA prevalence but relatively low rates of MRSA infection. Trial Registration isrctn. org Identifier: ISRCTN06603006.
引用
收藏
页码:1149 / 1157
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Benneyan JC, 1998, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V19, P265
  • [2] Biant LC, 2004, BRIT MED J, V329, P149
  • [3] Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Boyce, JM
    Cookson, B
    Christiansen, K
    Hori, S
    Vuopio-Varkila, J
    Kocagöz, S
    Öztop, AY
    Christiansen, K
    Hori, S
    Vuopio-Varkila, J
    Kocagöz, S
    Öztop, AY
    Vandenbroucke-Grauls, CMJE
    Harbarth, S
    Pittet, D
    [J]. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 5 (10) : 653 - 663
  • [4] Finding a method for optimizing risk adjustment when comparing surgical-site infection rates
    Brandt, C
    Hansen, S
    Sohr, D
    Daschner, F
    Rüden, H
    Gastmeier, P
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 25 (04) : 313 - 318
  • [5] Isolation of patients in single rooms or cohorts to reduce spread of MRSA in intensive-care units: prospective two-centre study
    Cepeda, JA
    Whitehouse, T
    Cooper, B
    Hails, J
    Jones, K
    Kwaku, F
    Taylor, L
    Hayman, S
    Cookson, B
    Show, S
    Kibbler, C
    Singer, M
    Bellingan, G
    Wilson, APR
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 365 (9456) : 295 - 304
  • [6] Real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus:: impact on nosocomial transmission and costs
    Conterno, L. O.
    Shymanski, J.
    Ramotar, K.
    Toye, B.
    van Walraven, C.
    Coyle, D.
    Roth, V. R.
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 28 (10) : 1134 - 1141
  • [7] Effect on MRSA transmission of rapid PCR testing of patients admitted to critical care
    Cunningham, R.
    Jenks, P.
    Northwood, J.
    Wallis, M.
    Ferguson, S.
    Hunt, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2007, 65 (01) : 24 - 28
  • [8] Controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus:: A feedback approach using annotated statistical process control charts
    Curran, ET
    Benneyan, JC
    Hood, J
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 23 (01) : 13 - 18
  • [9] Look before you leap: Active surveillance for multidrug-resistant organisms
    Diekema, Daniel J.
    Edmond, Michael B.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 44 (08) : 1101 - 1107
  • [10] Political versus epidemiological correctness
    Farr, Barry M.
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 28 (05) : 589 - 593