Why are local authorities reluctant to externalise (and do they have good reason)?

被引:19
作者
Entwistle, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff Business Sch, Ctr Local & Reg Govt Res, Cardiff CF10 3EU, Wales
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY | 2005年 / 23卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1068/c0419
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In vogue with the international currents of public management, the United Kingdom's New Labour government sees the outsourcing, or externalisation, of public service delivery as a key instrument of performance improvement. Evidence suggests, however, that a significant proportion of local authorities are reluctant to externalise. On the basis of fifty interviews in six case-study authorities, the author identifies five reasons for a reluctance to externalise. He further considers the degree of theoretical support for this reluctance, concluding that gaps in our knowledge-critical to 'make or buy' decisions-make it impossible to determine whether a reluctance to externalise is well founded or not.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 206
页数:16
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Strategic outsourcing
    Alexander, M
    Young, D
    [J]. LONG RANGE PLANNING, 1996, 29 (01) : 116 - 119
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1975, Markets and Hierarchies
  • [3] [Anonymous], COMP PROC
  • [4] Atkinson John., 1984, Personnel Management, V16, P18, DOI DOI 10.1108/EB017079
  • [5] *AUD COMM, 2000, CHANG GEAR BEST VAL
  • [6] *AUD COMM, 2003, PATT IMPR
  • [7] BAMOL WJ, 1982, CONTESTABLE MARKETS
  • [8] Human services and the voluntary sector: Towards a theory of comparative advantage
    Billis, D
    Glennerster, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 1998, 27 : 79 - 98
  • [9] Blair T., 1998, Leading the way: a new vision for local government
  • [10] Human resource management in the public and private sectors: An empirical comparison
    Boyne, G
    Jenkins, G
    Poole, M
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1999, 77 (02) : 407 - 420