Biomarker as a classifier in pharmacogenomics clinical trials: a tribute to 30th anniversary of PSI

被引:27
作者
Wang, Sue-Jane [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Off Translat Sci, Off Biostat, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
关键词
adaptive vs guided design; companion diagnostic; prognostic-predictive; prospective/retrospective; clinical utility;
D O I
10.1002/pst.316
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Pharmacogenetics is one of many evolving sciences that have come to the fore since the formation of the Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry (PSI) 30 years ago. Following the completion of the human genome project and the HapMap in the early 21st century, pharmacogenetics has gradually focused on studies of whole-genome single-nucleotide-polymorphisms screening associating disease pathophysiology with potential therapeutic interventions. Around this time, transcription profiling aiming at similar objectives has also been actively pursued, known as pharmacogenomics. It has become increasingly apparent that treatment effects between different genomic patient subsets can be dissimilar and the value and need for genomic biomarkers to help predict effects, particularly in cancer clinical studies, have become issues of paramount importance. Pharmacogenomics/pharmaogenetics has thus become intensely focused on the search for genomic biomarkers for use as classifiers to select patients in randomized-controlled trials. We highlight that the predictive utility of a genomic classifier has tremendous clinical appeal and that there will be growing examples in which use of a companion diagnostic will need to he considered and may become an integral part in the utilization of drugs in medical practice. The credible mechanism to test the clinical utility of a genomic classifier is to employ the study results from a prospective trial that recruits all patients. Such investigations, if well designed, will allow analysis of all relevant performance factors in the drug and diagnostic combination including the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the diagnostic test and the efficacy of the drug. Published in 2007 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 296
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   A haplotype map of the human genome [J].
Altshuler, D ;
Brooks, LD ;
Chakravarti, A ;
Collins, FS ;
Daly, MJ ;
Donnelly, P ;
Gibbs, RA ;
Belmont, JW ;
Boudreau, A ;
Leal, SM ;
Hardenbol, P ;
Pasternak, S ;
Wheeler, DA ;
Willis, TD ;
Yu, FL ;
Yang, HM ;
Zeng, CQ ;
Gao, Y ;
Hu, HR ;
Hu, WT ;
Li, CH ;
Lin, W ;
Liu, SQ ;
Pan, H ;
Tang, XL ;
Wang, J ;
Wang, W ;
Yu, J ;
Zhang, B ;
Zhang, QR ;
Zhao, HB ;
Zhao, H ;
Zhou, J ;
Gabriel, SB ;
Barry, R ;
Blumenstiel, B ;
Camargo, A ;
Defelice, M ;
Faggart, M ;
Goyette, M ;
Gupta, S ;
Moore, J ;
Nguyen, H ;
Onofrio, RC ;
Parkin, M ;
Roy, J ;
Stahl, E ;
Winchester, E ;
Ziaugra, L ;
Shen, Y .
NATURE, 2005, 437 (7063) :1299-1320
[2]   Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework [J].
Atkinson, AJ ;
Colburn, WA ;
DeGruttola, VG ;
DeMets, DL ;
Downing, GJ ;
Hoth, DF ;
Oates, JA ;
Peck, CC ;
Schooley, RT ;
Spilker, BA ;
Woodcock, J ;
Zeger, SL .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 69 (03) :89-95
[3]   Herceptin® alone or in combination with chemotherapy in the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer:: Pivotal trials [J].
Baselga, J .
ONCOLOGY, 2001, 61 :14-21
[4]   Gene signature evaluation as a prognostic tool: challenges in the design of the MINDACT trial [J].
Bogaerts, Jan ;
Cardoso, Fatima ;
Buyse, Marc ;
Braga, Sofia ;
Loi, Sherene ;
Harrison, Jillian A. ;
Bines, Jacques ;
Mook, Stella ;
Decker, Nuria ;
Ravdin, Peter ;
Therasse, Patrick ;
Rutgers, Emiel ;
van't Veer, Laura J. ;
Piccart, Martine .
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2006, 3 (10) :540-551
[5]   Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 49 (01) :1-6
[6]   Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls [J].
Burton, Paul R. ;
Clayton, David G. ;
Cardon, Lon R. ;
Craddock, Nick ;
Deloukas, Panos ;
Duncanson, Audrey ;
Kwiatkowski, Dominic P. ;
McCarthy, Mark I. ;
Ouwehand, Willem H. ;
Samani, Nilesh J. ;
Todd, John A. ;
Donnelly, Peter ;
Barrett, Jeffrey C. ;
Davison, Dan ;
Easton, Doug ;
Evans, David ;
Leung, Hin-Tak ;
Marchini, Jonathan L. ;
Morris, Andrew P. ;
Spencer, Chris C. A. ;
Tobin, Martin D. ;
Attwood, Antony P. ;
Boorman, James P. ;
Cant, Barbara ;
Everson, Ursula ;
Hussey, Judith M. ;
Jolley, Jennifer D. ;
Knight, Alexandra S. ;
Koch, Kerstin ;
Meech, Elizabeth ;
Nutland, Sarah ;
Prowse, Christopher V. ;
Stevens, Helen E. ;
Taylor, Niall C. ;
Walters, Graham R. ;
Walker, Neil M. ;
Watkins, Nicholas A. ;
Winzer, Thilo ;
Jones, Richard W. ;
McArdle, Wendy L. ;
Ring, Susan M. ;
Strachan, David P. ;
Pembrey, Marcus ;
Breen, Gerome ;
St Clair, David ;
Caesar, Sian ;
Gordon-Smith, Katherine ;
Jones, Lisa ;
Fraser, Christine ;
Green, Elain K. .
NATURE, 2007, 447 (7145) :661-678
[7]  
Buyse M, 2000, Biostatistics, V1, P49, DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/1.1.49
[8]   Surrogate end points in clinical trials: Are we being misled? [J].
Fleming, TR ;
DeMets, DL .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 125 (07) :605-613
[9]  
Fleming TR., 1992, STAT SCI, V7, P428
[10]   Adaptive signature design: An adaptive clinical trial design for generating and prospectively testing a gene expression signature for sensitive patients [J].
Freidlin, B ;
Simon, R .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 11 (21) :7872-7878