Episiotomy increases perineal laceration length in primiparous women

被引:49
作者
Nager, CW [1 ]
Helliwell, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Med Ctr 8433, Dept Reprod Med, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
episiotomy; perineal laceration; anal sphincter disruption;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2001.116095
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical factors that contribute to posterior perineal laceration length. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational study was performed in 80 consenting, mostly primiparous women with term pregnancies. Posterior perineal lacerations were measured immediately after delivery. Numerous maternal, fetal, and operator variables were evaluated against laceration length and degree of tear. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate laceration length and parametric clinical variables. Nonparametric clinical variables were evaluated against laceration length by the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: A multivariate stepwise linear regression equation revealed that episiotomy adds nearly 3 cm to perineal lacerations. Tear length was highly associated with the degree of tear (R = 0.86, R-2 = 0.73) and the risk of recognized anal sphincter disruption. None of 35 patients without an episiotomy had a recognized anal sphincter disruption, but 6 of 27 patients with an episiotomy did (P < .001). Body mass index was the only maternal or fetal variable that showed even a slight correlation with laceration length (R = 0.30, P = .04). CONCLUSION: Episiotomy is the overriding determinant of perineal laceration length and recognized anal sphincter disruption.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 450
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
BRYMAN A, 1997, QUANTITATIVE DATA AN
[2]   The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction [J].
Bump, RC ;
Mattiasson, A ;
Bo, K ;
Brubaker, LP ;
DeLancey, JOL ;
Klarskov, P ;
Shull, BL ;
Smith, ARB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) :10-17
[3]  
Carrier G, 1999, SUMMER CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY 1999, P3
[4]   RISK-FACTORS FOR 3RD-DEGREE AND 4TH-DEGREE PERINEAL LACERATIONS IN FORCEPS AND VACUUM DELIVERIES [J].
COMBS, CA ;
ROBERTSON, PA ;
LAROS, RK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 163 (01) :100-104
[5]  
CRAWFORD LA, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P257
[6]   Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia [J].
Fraser, WD ;
Marcoux, S ;
Krauss, I ;
Douglass, J ;
Goulet, C ;
Boulvain, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (05) :1165-1172
[7]  
HAADEM K, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V70, P53
[8]   Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system [J].
Hall, AF ;
Theofrastous, JP ;
Cundiff, GW ;
Harris, RL ;
Hamilton, LF ;
Swift, SE ;
Bump, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (06) :1467-1470
[9]   RELATIONSHIP OF EPISIOTOMY TO PERINEAL TRAUMA AND MORBIDITY, SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, AND PELVIC FLOOR RELAXATION [J].
KLEIN, MC ;
GAUTHIER, RJ ;
ROBBINS, JM ;
KACZOROWSKI, J ;
JORGENSEN, SH ;
FRANCO, ED ;
JOHNSON, B ;
WAGHORN, K ;
GELFAND, MM ;
GURALNICK, MS ;
LUSKEY, GW ;
JOSHI, AK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 171 (03) :591-598
[10]  
Labrecque M, 1997, CAN MED ASSOC J, V156, P797