Diagnostic utility of abbreviated fluency measures in Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia

被引:216
作者
Canning, SJD
Leach, L
Stuss, D
Ngo, L
Black, SE
机构
[1] Sunybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Cognit Neurol Unit, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Rotman Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1212/WNL.62.4.556
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Several studies indicate semantic fluency more sensitively discriminates patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) from normal elderly persons, with disproportionate impairment of semantic over phonemic fluency. Objective: To determine the ability of abbreviated fluency measures in the clinic setting (1-minute letter F and animal fluency tests) to detect AD, and to assess whether difference scores between these measures discriminate patients with AD and vascular dementia (VaD) from normal elderly persons. Methods: The authors studied patients with AD (n = 98) meeting National Institute of Neurological Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria, VaD patients (n = 18) meeting National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences criteria, cognitively impaired but not demented patients (CIND; n = 25), vascular CIND patients (VCIND; n = 24), and normal control subjects (NCs; n = 46). Results: Analysis of covariance controlling for age, education, and overall impairment indicated all groups generated fewer animal names compared with NCs, whereas only VaD patients generated fewer letter F words compared with NCs. On standardized scores, patients with AD and ClND, unlike those with WIND and VaD, scored significantly worse on the animal fluency test than on the letter F fluency test. The animal fluency test was superior in discriminating all patient groups from NCs. Positive likelihood ratios (PLRs) revealed animal fluency scores <15 were 20 times more likely in a patient with AD than in an NC (sensitivity = 0.88; specificity = 0.96). Letter F scores <4 discriminated VaD from AD patients (PLR = 4.0; sensitivity = 0.44; specificity = 0.90). Difference scores <0 (i.e., fewer animal than letter F words) discriminated patients with WIND from those with CIND (PLR = 2.5; sensitivity = 0.32; specificity = 1.00). Conclusions: A 1-minute semantic fluency test can assist in early detection of dementia in the memory clinic setting.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 562
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, STUD NEUROPSYCHOL DE
[2]   Word-list generation deficits in dementia [J].
Barr, A ;
Brandt, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 18 (06) :810-822
[3]   SEMANTIC AND LETTER CATEGORY NAMING IN ALZHEIMERS PATIENTS - A PREDICTABLE DIFFERENCE [J].
BAYLES, KA ;
SALMON, DP ;
TOMOEDA, CK ;
JACOBS, D ;
CAFFREY, JT ;
KASZNIAK, AW ;
TROSTER, AI .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 5 (04) :335-347
[4]  
Bentham PW, 1997, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V12, P575, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199705)12:5<575::AID-GPS566>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-N
[6]   EPISODIC AND SEMANTIC MEMORY - A COMPARISON OF AMNESIC AND DEMENTED PATIENTS [J].
BUTTERS, N ;
GRANHOLM, E ;
SALMON, DP ;
GRANT, I ;
WOLFE, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 9 (05) :479-497
[7]   Diagnostic utility of letter fluency, category fluency, and fluency difference scores in Alzheimer's disease [J].
Cerhan, JH ;
Ivnik, RJ ;
Smith, GE ;
Tangalos, EC ;
Petersen, RC ;
Boeve, BF .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2002, 16 (01) :35-42
[8]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[9]   Letter and category fluency in community-dwelling Canadian seniors: A comparison of normal participants to those with dementia of the Alzheimer or vascular type [J].
Crossley, M ;
DArcy, C ;
Rawson, NSB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 19 (01) :52-62
[10]   COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN THE NONDEMENTED ELDERLY - RESULTS FROM THE CANADIAN STUDY OF HEALTH AND AGING [J].
EBLY, EM ;
HOGAN, DB ;
PARHAD, IM .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1995, 52 (06) :612-619