Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps

被引：361

作者：

Bickenbach, JE

Chatterji, S

Badley, EM

Üstün, TB ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] WHO, Div Mental Hlth, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland

[2] WHO, Prevent Subst Abuse Assessment & Classificat Unit, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland

[3] Arthrit Community Res & Evaluat Unit, Toronto, ON, Canada

来源：

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE | 1999年 / 48卷 / 09期

关键词：

ICIDH; disablement; impairment; handicap; discrimination; universalism; WHO; disability policy;

D O I：

10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00441-9

中图分类号：

R1 [预防医学、卫生学];

学科分类号：

1004 ; 120402 ;

摘要：

A review and critique of models of disability is presented, tracing,the development of frameworks and classificatory instruments (International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps) over the past 20 years. While the 'social' model is now universally accepted, it is argued that universalism as a model for theory development, research and advocacy serves disabled persons more effectively than a civil rights or 'minority group' approach. The development of the revised International Classification (ICIDH-2) is discussed in this light. (C) 1999 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：1173 / 1187

页数：15

共 81 条

[1] Abberley P., 1987, DISABILITY HANDICAP, V2, P5, DOI [DOI 10.1080/02674648766780021, 10.1080/02674648766780021]
[2] AINLEY SC, 1986, DILEMMA DIFFERENCE M
[3] Albrecht G.L., 1992, The disability business: Rehabilitation in America
[4] AMUNDSON R, 1992, J SOCIAL PHILOS, V23
[5] [Anonymous], REDEFINING REMEDIAL
[6] [Anonymous], J DISABILITY POLICY
[7] [Anonymous], DISABILITY SOC EMERG
[8] [Anonymous], 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps
[9] [Anonymous], 1988, Women with Disabilities Essays in Psychology, Culture, and Politics
[10] [Anonymous], SOC INFLUENCES REHAB

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 →