Why Does Misallocation Persist?

被引:257
作者
Banerjee, Abhijit V. [1 ]
Moll, Benjamin [2 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
OCCUPATIONAL CHOICE; OPTIMAL-GROWTH; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1257/mac.2.1.189
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Recent papers argue that the misallocation of resources can explain large cross-country TFP differences. This argument is underpinned by empirical evidence documenting substantial dispersion in the marginal products of resources, particularly capital, in developing countries. But why does misallocation persists? That is, why don't distortions disappear on their own? This is particularly true for capital misallocation, a point we illustrate in a simple model of capital accumulation with credit constraints. We distinguish between misallocation on the intensive and the extensive margin, and show that the former should disappear asymptotically under general conditions, while the latter may persist. We conclude by discussing possible theories of persistent misallocation. (JEL D24, E22, G31, G32, L26)
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 206
页数:18
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   A theory of trickle-down growth and development [J].
Aghion, P ;
Bolton, P .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1997, 64 (02) :151-172
[2]  
Alfaro L., 2008, NBER WORKING PAPER S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 11267 NAT BUR EC RES
[4]  
BAI CE, 2006, BROOKINGS PAPERS EC, V2, P61
[5]  
BANERJEE A, 2008, DO FIRMS WANT BORROW
[6]  
Banerjee A., 2003, ADV EC ECONOMETRICS, VIII, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511610264.002
[7]  
Banerjee Ahbijit., 2009, The Shape of Temptation: Implications for the Economic Lives of the Poor
[8]   OCCUPATIONAL CHOICE AND THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPMENT [J].
BANERJEE, AV ;
NEWMAN, AF .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1993, 101 (02) :274-298
[9]  
Banerjee AV, 2005, HANDB ECON, V22, P473
[10]  
Bartelsman E., 2008, CROSS COUNTRY DIFFER